From the GATW Archives: Skype Video Interview: Ashton Kutcher (SPREAD)

image

It’s very intimidating to speak to a guy who’s married to one of the sexiest women in Hollywood, pops Cristal on a regular basis with P. Diddy, and has the most followers on Twitter. But you know, Ashton Kutcher is one of the most laidback guys I’ve ever spoken to. Normally I have some sort of funny intro to start off an interview, but always abandon it due to high anxiety. Not with Ashton - I went with it, and so did he.

Check out the two versions of our interview with Ashton below. Please let us know which you like best. We did it on Skype, which is what studios are trying to break into. Not sure if I’m digging this just yet (bad video quality and I’m a huge fan of face-to-face interaction) but just being able to speak to Ashton is a huge honor. I use the word honor because you can tell his responses to our questions were genuine and honest. This gentleman worked his ass off to get SPREAD off the ground.

SPREAD opens in theaters August 14, and stars Ashton Kutcher, Anne Heche, and Margarita Levieva.

Version 1

VERSION 2

From the GATW Archives: Video Interview: Neill Blomkamp (writer/director) and Sharlto Copley (actor/badass) talk DISTRICT 9 and possible sequel!

image

Back at Comic-Con, I briefly spoke to Neill and Sharlto (see that HERE!) about their hush hush sci-fi flick, DISTRICT 9. For those who don’t already know this, DISTRICT 9 is the full-length follow up to Neill’s short film, ALIVE IN JOBURG.

Last week I got to speak to the nice fellas again, going more in depth with how DISTRICT 9 was created. If you’ve seen the film, then you know there are layers upon layers, so it would be easy to sit with the two and just talk for hours. Unfortunately, I only had around six minutes, so I narrowed it down to what I thought were the questions people would enjoy learning about. So, without further ado, watch and enjoy!

Please be patient while the video loads. Thank you!

CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE INTERVIEW!

From the GATW Archives: Interview: Bobcat Goldthwait (writer/director, WORLD’S GREATEST DAD)

image

There’s two things I learned from interviewing Bobcat Goldthwait. The first being this: NOTHING is taboo. When I say nothing is taboo, I mean he’ll bring up his idea of a musical that involves fisting - and there’s no snickering (except on my end) and he speaks of it (fisting) like it’s no big deal.

The second thing I learned is that Bobcat is the coolest person I’ve ever spoken to. That became obvious when the first question I asked him was “how are you doing?” And his response was “Oh, I’m okey-doke.” Bobcat, if you read this, let’s do another soon, k?

Check out our interview, where we talk about his new film, WORLD’S GREATEST DAD. This is fairly long interview, clocking in around 19 minutes, but there’s a bonus - I also spoke with Daryl Sabara, who plays Robin Williams’ doomed perverted son. I can promise you this, this will be the best 19 minutes your ears will ever have. Okay, maybe not the best, but I can promise you won’t regret listening to this interview. Both Bobcat and Daryl are very, very interesting people. Give it a go! Let me know what you thought!

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN TO THE INTERVIEW!

From the GATW Archives: Interview: Woody Harrelson and director Oren Moverman (THE MESSENGER)

Never in my life did I think I would be writing on a movie website telling people that I have interviewed Woody Harrelson - and on a fancy terrace in Austin, TX at that. But, my friends, that did happen, and I’m about to share it all with you.

Woody and director Oren Moverman came through Austin during the Austin Film Festival to promote their new film, THE MESSENGER. If you didn’t catch this film at a festival, make sure to see it in theaters when it opens this Friday (November 20). After I watched this film, I started it over and watched it again. It touched me, it moved me, and it made me tear up.

Check out our interview after the jump, during which Oren talks about the struggles and pressures he had after choosing this to be his film debut, and Woody tells us that he wants to do romantic parts again.

GATW: The first question is for Oren Moverman, this is your debut film. It’s a pretty heavy film for your first one. Can you talk about why you chose [THE MESSENGER] to be your first [feature length film]?

Director, Oren Moverman: I wasn’t originally the director of the movie, I was a co-writer with Alessandro Camon, we wrote the script and we developed it actually with three directors one after the other, each one of them great in his own way, but it didn’t really work out. The first one was Sydney Pollack, who loved the script and wanted to do it. But he had a different idea of where it should go and then we decided it really shouldn’t go that way, which was to make it more of a love story. Then we had Roger Michell, who is a British director, a great guy, and we worked with him a lot on the relationship between the two men. And then he couldn’t do it because he had to go do another movie. And then Ben Affleck was kind of thinking about it as a directing vehicle as a second movie, but that kind of didn’t work out. So we were left without a director and I was about to go direct another movie as my first movie and they offered it to me, and after thinking about it, I mean, at first I said no, because I wanted to get someone really good and not a first timer, even though it was me, and then I sort of was convinced, rather easily, that this should be a movie to make. I knew it so intimately. I knew it from the inside. I knew every particular permutation of what the story could be. So it seemed a natural fit.

GATW: My follow-up question, you always see in other movies, you see [a soldier] comes up and says “so and so is dead” and it’s just the emotions of the deceased family’s side. Can you talk about the research and how it came about to write [on the soldier’s perspective]?

OM: It came out of a very casual discussion over drinks with Alessandro [Camon] and we were talking about the war and America in general. We’re both outsiders, I’m from Israel, he’s from Italy. We talked about how we never really get to see the stories about the people who have to live with all the consequences of war, and the people who have to have personal relationships with [those involved in war]. It’s not just about politics, it’s just not about opinions, it’s really about your loved ones or you. So we thought of the Casualty Notification Officer as an amazing dramatic vehicle to go into these small stories of the families who are dealing with these situations right now and then get out and feel the effect of war and military life on these two guys. So that was really the inspiration and we just kept developing it, working it, shaping it. You know, it’s funny you’re saying it’s heavy, it’s obviously a serious subject matter but for us it was never about the seriousness of it or the heaviness of it. For us, it’s a very hopeful movie with a lot of humor in it that addresses in general how you go through a lot of shit in life, and how do you deal with it? Well, you deal it with through friendship, through love, through humor, through camaraderie, all the good things that make you feel lucky to be alive.

GATW: [To Woody Harrelson] I talked to Ben [Foster] at [San Diego Comic-Con] and he was telling us all to see THE MESSENGER, and how incredible your performance was. You and Ben, your chemistry in the movie was great. When I watched it, I had to watch it right after it again. It seemed like you two have known each other your whole lives.

Woody Harrelson: I have to say it feels that way, he feels like my brother and I love him like my brother. I think he’s one of the greatest guys I’ve ever met in my life and definitely one of the greatest actors. That’s so funny that he was so flattering, because I think his performance is just staggering. To watch it up close, what I saw, and there’s a lot of scenes that I’m not in with him in the movie, but I told friends “this is some of the best acting I’ve ever seen up close.” Then to watch the whole thing and see how, because you don’t shoot these things chronologically, of course Oren is giving him guidance but he has to be able to keep in his head where he shows you what, because he’s got that wall, and he’s got to show the little fissures in the wall, the little bracks, and slowly start to let you in. Charles Lotton said [that “Eyes find eyes, the melody is in the eyes”}. When that camera is on him, it’s something in his eyes, it’s incredible. Anyway, I’m a big fan of his and I love him.

GATW: What kind of research did you do for this character?

WH: Prior to coming here, I really was ill-prepared, in the sense that I was working on this other film and in Romania that couldn’t be more different. So, the closer I was getting to shooting [THE MESSENGER] I was getting more and more nervous. Fortunately, [Oren] sent me “The Things They Carried” by Tim O’Brien, and it got [me] into the head space of soldiering. He also sent me two different uniforms, fatigues and class a’s, combat boots, hat, everything. And I actually was wearing that around in Bucharest, and you know, I’d go to these places and people would think “this guy wishes he was in the military” which, at the time I was. Then also, when I finally got here, I was feeling it. You know, I’m a hippie from Hawaii, so, I feel so completely diametrically different than [his character] Captain Tony Stone, so I was needing a lot of reassurance from Oren that everything was going to be all right. So we went to Walter Reed [Army Medical Center], met with soldiers and heard their stories. It was a really powerful experience. Then we went to the Casualty Notification National Office in Arlington and slowly, in less than a week before we started shooting, I started slowly feeling closer and closer to ready. I never did feel actually ready. I think maybe, the last two days of shooting I did.

OM: You’re also selling yourself short. Woody came in with a lot of ideas and a lot of thoughts behind the character. He didn’t have a lot of time to physically prepare for it, although he did do some mental exercises that had to do with his physicality, running and getting into the head space of how a soldier would do things. But, he came into it with little time. His passion for the movie is what made him do it because he was shooting another a movie that really didn’t have the time to spare to give him away. But we really negotiated with them and to their credit they really respected Woody’s passion for the movie. He doesn’t remember it that way because I think he felt like “I wish I had more time to prepare” but he came with a lot of solid ideas and he got me to know the character a lot faster, the character that he was bringing with him, a lot faster than I got him to feel comfortable. So, stop selling yourself short.

GATW: Woody’s the man!

WH: I actually I’m giving you [Moverman] credit because I really did feel with the few days before shooting, arriving here from Bucharest in a total different head space, it really was an added job for him on top of the million other things you gotta do as a director, especially with something so intense that shoots in 28 days. I added a burden to him and he really helped me. But I was doing things [to prepare for the role], I was working out quite a bit and I would go jogging, I would be jogging along and then I would really think of myself as Tony Stone, drawing a strength and a confidence, a determination, I really felt like a different person when I would shift just that one thing.

GATW: Back to this being your first feature, did you feel a lot of stress because it was such a powerful cast. Did you have any doubts?

OM: Every time you shoot a movie it’s a pressure cooker from any perspective: acting, directing, shooting - there’s a lot of pressure - you never have enough time, we had 28 days to shoot the whole movie. So you know, there was a whole set of pressures. But I have to say, that this was a group that was in sync really quickly. That trip we took to Walter Reed just solidified everything from the moment we sat down together that we were in this together and we were going to do it in a really special way that’s meaningful to us and hopefully then be meaningful to an audience because they will see our commitment to it. So, we had to make a lot of tough decisions on this movie and take a lot of chances, and the reason we could do it was because we were really supporting each other. So I would say that there were a lot of pressures but there could have been a lot more and we really diffused a lot of them.

GATW: My last question is for you, Woody. As an actor, is it difficult going from comedic acting, to dramatic acting, to romantic acting?

WH: Hey, that’s a good point, by the way! Romantic acting, I’m not getting asked to do that much, I just want to put that out there. I don’t remember the last romantic comedy that came down the pipe. But yeah, this I did well before doing ZOMBIELAND, for example, this [movie] I put it in its own class, because it was a project that was demanding in the sense that it demands your heart. You have to throw your heart into it, you have to completely immerse yourself mentally, physically, emotionally in the process. It was a 28 day shoot for [Oren], but for me it was a three week shoot, and in that three weeks I didn’t want to feel in the end of it to look at this thing and feel like “fuck! I wish I could have got that right!” because it deserves it. To me, my allegiance was to the script. The script is the most powerful script I’ve ever read, so I owed it to Oren as the co-creator of the script as well as the director, I didn’t want to phone it in. So, I wouldn’t say hard, it just needed to be more of a total commitment.

photo

From the GATW Archives: GATW does JoBlo.com’s podcast!

Early last week, Johnny Moreno of JoBlo.com asked Rusty and I to be their guest on their weekly podcast. Being a big fan of the ‘Blo since 2001, I said, “Sure, I guess.” Just kidding, I replied within minutes with the eff word followed by “YES!” We recorded the show on Friday (Feb. 19) evening. I’m very excited to share this with you because this is 1) the first podcast I’ve ever been on (and with Rusty) and 2) IT’S JOBLO.COM.

Awesome poster made by Joblo podcast listener Andres!

In the cast, we talk to Jim Law and Moreno about our beginnings and what we’ve been up to since we first started. Oh, we also talk about our relatives, whiskey, and how much I hate mean people. Click HERE to listen and/or download to the podcast! Enjoy!

From the GATW Archives: Sundance 2010 Review: JOAN RIVERS: A PIECE OF WORK

image

Editor’s Note: This review was originally published on January 28.

Rating: 4/5

DirectorsRicki Stern and Anne Sundberg

Joan Rivers is a piece of work. At 75, she’s still one of the hardest working comedians today. While doing a roundtable with her yesterday for her new film, JOAN RIVERS: A PIECE OF WORK, she was asked if she was intimidated by the young and up-and-coming female comedians. She simply responded, “I’m not done yet.” She’s courageous, her stand-up boldly goes where most comedians won’t, and she’s the first to stand up and say plastic surgery is one of the best decisions she’s ever made. There is one thing though that she fears though, and that’s an empty calendar.

In A PIECE OF WORK, filmmakers Ricki Stern and Anne Sundberg (THE DEVIL CAME ON HORSEBACK) capture Joan’s 75th year of life. It’s interesting, it’s funny, it’s heartfelt, and it’s heartbreaking. In this year, Joan struggles to make money, but she doesn’t give up. Even with younger, funnier, and more talented people snagging jobs she’d easily do, she won’t stop until she gets that last punchline in. She’s doing stand-up at shitty bars (she even makes a joke about a chair seat being duct-taped together) and sells jewelry on infomercials. What happened to the glamorous Joan we’ve all come to love (or hate)?

This delicious documentary did teach me about one of Joan’s most important assets, and that’s her dirty, dirty mouth. She’s one of the most disgusting, gross, and hilarious people I have ever watched on screen. Here’s one of the many quotes she said in the film that absolutely blew my mind - “My vagina farts so loud, my gynecologist has to wear ear plugs.” Holy shit, right? I thought the same thing. The woman has no boundaries.

Jaw-dropping hilarity aside, this documentary admirably recounts the major upsets in Joan’s life. Did you know Johnny Carson discovered Joan, only to blacklist her a few years later? I sure didn’t. Joan’s mouth got so popular on the Carson show that she would randomly host it herself. Then another television station asked her if she wanted her own show. She took it, and was forever banished from NBC. Of course there’s always two sides to a story, and since we’ll never see the other side of that, it’s obvious the banishment boiled down to one thing - competition.

Another depressing moment in Joan’s life that PIECE OF WORK covers is the unfortunate suicide of her late husband, and daughter Melissa’s father, Edgar Rosenberg. Shortly after Joan took on her own show, ratings didn’t do as planned and it was canceled; one of the stress factors that contributed to Rosenberg’s death. This segment is respectful and just focuses on Joan recalling what happened. She tears up and I teared up with her.

In the end, Ricki Stern and Anne Sundberg did a classy job capturing one of the most famous divas on TV. From the introduction until the credits, boredom never struck once. See this film and remember, Joan Rivers ain’t going anywhere.

From the GATW Archives: Sundance 2010 Review: THE KIDS ARE ALL RIGHT

image

Rating: 4/5

Writer: Lisa Cholodenko,
Director: Lisa Cholodenko
Cast: Annette Benning, Julianne Moore, Mia Wasikowska, Josh Hutcherson, Mark Ruffalo

Editor’s Note: This review was originally published on February 4, 2010.

In about a month, we might have our very first Oscar-winning female director, Kathryn Bigelow (THE HURT LOCKER). Kathryn didn’t set the trend for women in film but this will, without a doubt, boost how much influence and importance women can be behind the camera. This brings me to this year’s Sundance film festival, which had a wide and diverse number of films made by women.

One of these films is THE KIDS ARE ALL RIGHT (not to be confused with The Who’s 1979 rockumentary), co-written and directed by Sundance Alumna Lisa Cholodenko. The film explores family life between lesbian married couple, Nic and Jules (played by Annette Benning and Julianne Moore, respectively). They have two children together, Joni and Laser (Mia Wasikowska and Josh Hutcherson) who were born through artificial insemination. Joni is about to graduate high school and trail off to the place were binge drinking and the walk of shame were made popular: college.

But there’s one thing both kids want to do before she leaves, and that’s meet the the man who donated the sperm that helped conceive them. They secretly meet the man (Mark Ruffalo), and now want him to be a part of their life. But Momma and Momma ain’t too happy with that and confusion ensues.

I want to give a high five to the person who cast Benning and Moore as the couple. I’m not sure whether it was Cholodenko herself, or Liz Dean and Laura Rosenthal (KIDS’ casting directors), but this was one of the best decisions made for the film. The chemistry between the two actresses took me out of my element of “this is just a movie,” and “they’re just acting.” They hold one of the best on-screen romances that I’ve ever seen before. Their humor, anger, and attitudes play off each other extremely well.

The reason why this romance works so well is because it was under the terrific direction of Lisa Cholodenko. No stranger to lesbian love, Cholodenko has directed an episode of  The L Word, and wrote/directed 1998’s HIGH ART, which won Sundance’s Waldo Salt Screenwriting award. Cholodenko has a real understanding of how this type of relationship should work (hint: just like everyone else’s). Throughout the film, both Nic and Jules are very strong characters, both of them handle serious situations in different ways, yet both stand their ground just as equally on important, real life topics.

The problems for the teens in the film are some of the same problems we faced when we were growing up. There’s always the bad friend you reluctantly hang out with that your parents have hated since “Hello Mr. and Mrs. Blank, I’m trouble.” At some point in your life, you realize that person was nothing but a piece of shit and you send them packing. That’s one of the problems Laser (yep, he’s real name is Laser) is currently facing in his rebellious years.

This is why THE KIDS ARE ALL RIGHT works, and works well. We’re shown real life problems in a fictional story that gives us real life solutions. Bravo Lisa, your film is more than all right.

From the GATW Archives: Sundance 2010 Interview: Joan Rivers and Co-Directors Ricki Stern and Anne Sundberg

image

Back at Sundance I did a roundtable interview with the crème de la crème of divas, Joan Rivers, who was in town to promote the world premiere of the documentary, JOAN RIVERS: A PIECE OF WORK (my review can be found HERE).  This fabulous documentary tells us two very important things about the lady: first, she’s a survivor; and second, she has, without a doubt, one of the dirtiest mouths to come out of show business. Around the middle of the interview, Rivers was accompanied by co-directors Ricki Stern and Anne Sundberg.

I was going to transcribe this interview, but Rivers is a riot and needs to be heard, not read.  Listen to the full 30-minute interview after the break.  This interview was conducted at Sundance with HitFix.com's Katie Hasty!

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN TO THE INTERVIEW!

From the GATW Archives: GATW DOES TIFF, DAY ONE: Planes, subways, and lost passports

This year marks the first time GATW has ever covered the Toronto International Film Festival. All my comrades are holding down the site while I’m here in Canada watching movies and interviewing some of the coolest people in cinema (all reviews and interview pieces to follow). I’m going to attempt to do a daily recap every day that I’m here. It’s pretty busy, but I’d like for you to see what we’re covering.

There was one small bump in the road I had to handle before I flew out from Dallas: I left my passport in Austin. Here’s the thing, I moved to Austin about a week and a half ago. So that meant I drove to Dallas - from Austin - and back in the same day. Luckily for this guy, my good buddy Luke Mullen (@ldmullen) met me halfway in Waco to bring me my passport. My numb butt and achey back (over 4 1/2 hours of driving will make any butt go numb) thanked him with Rudy’s BBQ.

I flew out on Friday at 6:30AM and arrived in Toronto around 10:30AM, picked up my badge (which now has a creepy photo of me forever on it), and met up with the kindest young lass in Canada, Jenn Mair. You see, Jenn is letting me sleep on her futon during my TIFF run here. It’s really nice to know good people.

The first film I saw here was Matt Reeves’ LET ME IN, which is a remake to the 2008 Swedish film, LET THE RIGHT ONE IN. To get to that screening, I took the subway, which was a first for me. I’m all grown up now, I guess. My complete thoughts on LET ME IN will be up here soon.

After LET ME IN, I caught the last 45 minutes of THE TOWN’s press conference. Yes, Ben Affleck and Jon Hamm are dreamy in person. Jeremy Renner, Chris Cooper, Blake Lively, and some of the other cast and crew were also there. I didn’t get a whole lot out of the conference, mainly because, well, some journalists were asking Ben Affleck questions about his hair. There are a few bad apples in every patch. My pal Katey Rich did get some good out of it - you can read here coverage over at Cinema Blend.

The second and last film I saw was Anna Boden and Ryan Fleck’s IT’S KIND OF A FUNNY STORY, an adaptation of Ned Vizzini’s novel of the same name. I must add - this is my favorite book.

Here’s some photos I took of my first day:

The wonderful Katey Rich from CinemaBlend.com

The wonderful Pete Sciretta from Slashfilm.com

The wonderful (and very, very funny) James Rocchi from MSNMovies.com

My First Quote in a Trailer: THE LOVED ONES

There are films out there that are violent for the sake of being violent, and then there are the ones like Sean Byrne's THE LOVED ONES that need more violence to push the story forward.  This film is what MISERY and PRETTY IN PINK would be like meshed together and set in hell.   If you've been around me a few times this year, then I've no doubt annoyed you with my endless babble of THE LOVED ONES.

Here’s THE LOVED ONES new spoiler free trailer.  This is a very short teaser showing how terrifying our villian, Lola (played by Robin McLeavy), is.  I really wish the Academy had a category for Best Badass, because I have no doubt McLeavy would be crowned it this year.

Check out the teaser after the jump.  Or, head over to www.whoisthekingofhorror.com and get interactive with the trailer’s adorable intro.  THE LOVED ONES hits Australian cinemas November 4th.  If you live in the U.S. and have seen the film and want to support it, please speak your voice so we can get it here.

CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE TRAILER!

From the GATW Archives: “And don’t call me Shirley”: R.I.P. Leslie Nielsen

Update: The Vancouver Sun has confirmed Nielsen passed away due to complications of pneumonia.

One of the funniest men in showbizness passed away today, Mister Leslie Nielsen.  Like many of you reading this article, I first saw Nielsen in the NAKED GUN series where he played Lt. Frank Drebin.  According to Fox News, first news of Nielson passing away today broke on twitter.  The cause of death hasn’t been confirmed, but the rumor is that it was due to complications of pneumonia.

From Fox News:

His nephew Doug Nielson, told CJOB that Leslie had been in the hospital in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida for 12 days and that with family and friends by his side at 5:30pm Sunday “he just fell asleep and passed away.”

I met Nielson two years ago at Comic-Con when he was there promoting STAN HELSING.  As expected, he was a very nice man, full of smiles and jokes.  Hopefully we’ll meet again where I will, in fact, call him Shirley.

From the GATW Archives: Sundance 2010 Video Interview: Philip Seymour Hoffman (JACK GOES BOATING)

image

Editor’s Note: This was originally published on January 28th, 2010.

A few days ago, I sat down with Philip Seymour Hoffman to talk about his new film, which marks his directorial debut, JACK GOES BOATING. In this story of broken – and sometimes clumsy – romance, Hoffman also takes the lead as Jack, a limo driver who dreams of better days and better pay. His daily pastimes are hanging out with best friend and fellow limo driver, Clyde (John Ortiz), and jamming to reggae (he’s even given his hair a weak attempt at dreadlocks). Jack wants love, and Jack may have found love when Clyde and his backbiting wife, Lucy (Daphne Rubin-Vega), set him up on a blind date with Lucy’s co-worker, Connie (Amy Ryan - who is best known for her brief stint on “The Office”).

Philip and I did the interview at the Myspace Cafe. My mood: Happy. Check out the interview after the jump, where we talk about the pressures of being a first-time director and other things JACK GOES BOATING related. Also, my review of the film can be read HERE. Big thanks to our friend, A.J. Meadows, for filming!

Interviewed/Edited by: Chase Whale

CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE INTERVIEW!

From the GATW Archives: GATW West Coast Editor Kate Erbland does “That Movie Show” with Bobby Miller

Bobby Miller and Kate Erbland have quickly become two of my favorite people on planet Earth. They’re funny, adorable, they kick dance, and they know how to tell a good story. I met Miller last year at Sundance, where his short film TUB premiered. Don’t know what TUB is? Read my review HERE. Oh, and to shameless plug us into an article already shamelessly plugging ourselves, here’s our interview with Miller about TUB.

Last month, our very own Erbland filmed her appearance on the third webisode of Bobby Miller’s That Movie Show. In it, Bobby gets advice on Nicolas Cage’s awesome long locks, talks to puppets, and wrangles Kate into talking about her top 10 films of the year. This is a webisode that will be talked about for centuries. Click on the above image to watch! A brand new episode of That Movie Show pops up on the Internet every Thursday.

Wanna follow Kate on Twitter? HERE YOU GO.

Wanna follow Bobby on Twitter? HERE YOU GO.

From the GATW Archives: Sundance 2010 Review: BLUE VALENTINE

image

Rating: 4/5

Written by: Derek Cianfrance, Joey Curtis, Cami Delavigne
Directed by: Derek Cianfrance

There’s two important films I’ve seen at this festival that gave this message: “Love is a motherfucker.” Or for all the sensitive types out there, “Love is tough.” And there’s two facts in life: we’re all going to die, and at some point, we’re all going to fall in love. Whether or not we stay in love, well, that’s another story.

WARNING: THE FOLLOWING CONTAINS MILD SPOILERS. READ AT YOUR OWN RISK YOU HOPELESS ROMANTIC!

This brings me to my second heartache of the festival, BLUE VALENTINE. Ryan Gosling and Michelle Williams star as married couple Dean and Cindy in a film that captures the few years of their marriage, cross-cutting from when they met to present time. Like (500) DAYS OF SUMMER (but much, much more adult themed), the present just isn’t as fun as the past.

The film opens with the young couple’s daughter, Frankie (Faith Wladyka), searching for her dog, Megan, in a field. She yells for her name, but the dog never responds. She crawls through the doggy door and plops herself into her father’s (Gosling) arms. Ryan Gosling is (as always) sensational, and his chemistry with Wladyka feels so natural. From the moment he appears on screen with her, we know Frankie’s his lifeline. He loves her like crazy. When she doesn’t want oatmeal, he puts her raisins on the table and begins to suck them up. She follows his lead and it’s adorable. When her dog turns up missing and he’s sure she won’t be back, he tells her, “I think she moved to Hollywood to be a movie dog.” It’s funny, and it eases the tension of what was just discovered.

On the other hand, from the first scene Dean and Cindy share together, the audience is shown something’s just not right with the two. It’s fairly obvious when two love birds have tension shared between them, and in this case, it’s a smacked right in our face. We’re not sure of what this tension is, but we know it’s there. It’s very difficult to watch them fall apart, as the scenes of them falling in love are beautiful. My heart warmed up to the couple as Cindy sang to Dean while he played his ukulele on a street corner on their first date. This film captures the rawness of love, and the heartbreak of a fictional relationship that all of us can relate so much to.

Not a lot of people know this, but this film has been ten years in the making. Co-Writer/director Derek Cianfrance finished the first draft in 1998, only to have delay after delay stall production. These delays couldn’t be more than a blessing though, as the two leads he hired could not have been more perfect. Dean and Connie’s chemistry is far too real. When they spend the night together in attempts to repair their broken love, I found myself fidgeting in my seat, waiting and hoping their love gets repaired.

Cianfrance dives deeply into the happiness and heartache a damaged relationship can give you and has created a story that understands how real life romance actually works. It may be painful at times, but folks, that’s real life for you. If you’ve ever been in love, if you’ve ever had your heart broken, see this film.

From the GATW Archives: Interview: THE MISSING PERSON actor Michael Shannon

image

Michael Shannon’s one humble dude. You probably wouldn’t expect that after seeing some of his insane performances (BUG, REVOLUTIONARY ROAD). I spoke with Michael on the phone last week about his recent role, THE MISSING PERSON, and the man’s answers to all my questions were very honest, very cool, and very well-formed. Check the out the interview, as well as the film’s official synopsis, poster, and trailer after the jump!

THE MISSING PERSON’s official synopsis: “Writer/Director Noah Buschel’s third feature, The Missing Person, stars Michael Shannon as John Rosow, a private detective hired to tail a man, Harold Fullmer, on a train from Chicago to Los Angeles. Rosow gradually uncovers Harold’s identity as a missing person; one of the thousands presumed dead after the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center. Persuaded by a large reward, Rosow is charged with bringing Harold back to his wife in New York City against his will. Ultimately Rosow must confront whether the decision to return Harold to a life that no longer exists is the right one. The Missing Person co-stars Academy Award © Nominee Amy Ryan and features a strong supporting cast including Margaret Colin, Linda Emond, Yul Vazquez and John Ventimigli

Missing Person Poster

GATW: Can you talk about how you got involved with THE MISSING PERSON? How you met up with Noah [Buschel, director], and what that process was like?

Michael Shannon: Well basically, it was through Amy Ryan [co-star]. Amy is a friend of mine and we had worked together on another project and Noah had written THE MISSING PERSON and he was trying to figure out who would be right for the part of John and Amy suggested me. And there was a reading, I guess they were trying to drum up some financing for the movie, and they had a reading of the screenplay. So Noah asked me to do the reading and he enjoyed what I did at the reading, I guess, enough to ask me to do the film and it was pretty much that simple. But Amy Ryan definitely was responsible for getting Noah and I in the same room.

GATW: For your role, you play an alcoholic private investigator; did you hang out with any PIs? What type of research did you do for the role?

MS: Well, I actually didn’t hang out with any detectives because I felt like was John was a pretty unique character in a pretty unique situation. You know the thing about the film, at least what I see when I watch it, is that it has a very dream-like kind of imaginary quality to it. I think a lot of this story is actually, potentially going on in John’s head, I don’t necessarily think it’s something that’s actually happening. I mean I wouldn’t want to take that possibility away from anybody watching it, but just in the way I personally approached it, I felt like it was much more than trying to convince anybody that I was a detective or that I understood what it was like to be a detective. It was more about— what exactly had happened to this guy? What was wrong with him? Why was he living in a dumpy little apartment in Chicago in a drunken haze? And going on that journey.

GATW: This film is obviously an indie film and it’s fantastic. What about indie films draws you to it?

MS: There’s a lot about it actually, generally on an independent film you have to work with fewer resources in a shorter amount of time. Which is a good thing for the actors because on a film that has a lot of money and a lot of time, you spend a lot of time sitting around. But on a lower budget film you don’t spend much time sitting around at all, you show up and you’re working all day and you go home at night with a sense of accomplishment as opposed to just feeling like you sat around all day long doing nothing. So that’s enjoyable.

I also feel like, if THE MISSING PERSON was a big budget studio film it would be a totally different film and Noah wouldn’t have been able to take a lot of the risks that he takes. It’s a very unusual movie and Noah makes a lot of decisions in it that are unconventional and can be confusing or unclear, [things] you have to think about, you have to meet the movie halfway. In a studio movie, it’s all about making sure that you don’t have to think about anything, that you just sit there and are excited the whole time. So I guess those are a couple of the differences I enjoy.

GATW: You just answered my follow up [question], I was going to ask that you have JONAH HEX coming up and if you could talk about indie [films] versus big budget. But I guess you just answered that with big budget you just go in, eat your popcorn and have some fun.

MS: Although JONAH HEX—for a studio movie—it was not a big budget, they were kind of roughing it down there. On JONAH HEX I was only there a couple of days, I just kind of popped in and out and had fun doing a couple of little scenes. But that was a hard shoot, I kind of know Josh [Brolin, star of JONAH HEX] a little bit, and I talked to him about it and he really had to bust his butt on that [movie] to get it done.

GATW: I recently saw [Werner] Herzog’s BAD LIEUTENANT, which is really awesome and you recently did MY SON, MY SON WHAT HAVE YE DONE with him and it’s garnering a ton of buzz but it’s getting a really limited release. Do you know if it’s going to have a wider release after it’s New York December release?

MS: The film MY SON, MY SON WHAT HAVE YE DONE has played in, I believe, three film festivals. It has played at Venice, Toronto and the Telluride [film festivals]. And the critical response has been…not entirely unfavorable from everyone but largely somewhat unfavorable from most people so, I think that’s had an effect on it. It’s a very unusual film, but I don’t know what that would surprise anybody. I mean it’s a Werner Herzog film. I’ve seen most of films and most of his films are extremely unconventional. But for some reason, this one is really seeming to irritate some people. I don’t know why, I don’t know what they expected when they walked into the theater. So I guess what they’re trying to do, the strategy right now, is to bring it out in New York and see how the general public feels about it here and then if people are digging it then maybe they’ll try to branch it out. I mean Werner’s films are not blockbusters, they never have been, and usually people discover them a few years after they come out.

GATW: For my last question, in REVOLUTIONARY ROAD you were this awesome, crazy guy. Same with BUG. Do you like playing those types of characters or is it just what you audition for and that’s what you got?

MS: I’d say it’s a mixture of the two. I mean, I can’t speak for everyone but I find that a life can be pretty challenging and difficult sometimes, and that people struggle. So the characters I gravitate towards usually are struggling with a challenge of some sort or another. I think that’s kind of why drama exists in the first place. I don’t know how interesting or compelling people who don’t have any problems are. I mean I guess that would be nice if the world was filled with people who didn’t have any problems but I don’t know interesting it would be. So yeah, I guess I’m drawn to people who are suffering in some way or another.

From the GATW Archives: Sundance 2011 Review: KABOOM

image

Rating: 4/5

Writer/directorGregg Araki
CastHaley BennettThomas DekkerJuno TempleJames Duval

KABOOM is filthy. If your eyes have ever been enriched with a Gregg Araki film (THE DOOM GENERATION, NOWHERE, and MYSTERIOUS SKIN to name a few), then you’re in for an explosion of chaos. After walking out of KABOOM, I wanted to take a nice, hot shower to wash off the dirtiness of what my eyeballs just watched, but holy hell I had a blast. KABOOM is 86 minutes of raunch, sex, cults, witches, dirty girl Juno Temple, and, yes, people wearing animal masks - and it’s all so fun.

I don’t know where to begin describing the story. KABOOM opens with college boy Smith (Thomas Dekker) having a dream. He’s walking down a hall, naked, passing two girls he’s never seen before, and it ends with him opening a door (with “19” slapped on it - this is crucial to the story) to a white room with a red garbage dumpster. This dream has been reoccurring for the last five nights and he doesn’t understand what it means. At a party one night, he runs into both girls from that dream. One vomits on him, and the other goes home with his best friend Stella (Haley Bennet). Things then, well, explode into a world of complications.

Araki parodies Hollywood’s most used stereotype. Smith’s roommate Thor (Chris Zylka) is a very good-looking blonde surfer dude who’s dumber than the idea of having Roseanne Barr sing the National Anthem at a baseball game (Google that). He’s not gay (no bros are, right?), but he and his best friend wrestle each other in their briefs while accusing the other of liking boys.  Zylka doesn’t overkill the stereotype, but milks playing the character with everything he’s got.

Juno Temple shows up in the film as a rowdy girl who sleeps with Smith for fun and teaches others how to orally please a girl. She’s rarely seen with clothes on or not having sex with someone, and this is me telling you that I’m not complaining. Temple’s London is a real charmer.

In the first half of the film, we’re watching an Araki film we’re used to. He champions homoeroticism, and his characters live without boundaries or rules. Strange is normal. Everyone sleeps with everyone. Araki beautifies raunch with extreme close-ups, slow motion, vibrant music, and awkward angles of cinematography. The man achieves exactly what he wants. There’s a lot of sex in KABOOM. A lot. Dekker’s Smith isn’t gay, isn’t straight, and isn’t sure what he wants but he’ll sleep with a guy or a girl if they ask.

When Smith’s dream finally makes sense, things get batshit crazy. Our final act strays completely away from what we’re used to from Araki. He is definitely saying something with this film. I agree with myself in saying he’s humorously giving the finger to the cruel critics who bashed his teen angst trilogy (TOTALLY FUCKED UP, THE DOOM GENERATION, NOWHERE) a while back. Or he could be saying “fuck you” to everyone. If you’re a fan of Araki’s previous work or just want to see something really fucked up, KABOOM is your movie.

From the GATW Archives: Sundance 2011 Review: OUR IDIOT BROTHER

image

Rating: 4/5

DirectorJesse Peretz
WritersEvgenia PeretzDavid Schisgall
CastPaul RuddElizabeth BanksZooey DeschanelSteve CooganRashida Jones,Adam Scott

Ned (Paul Rudd) is an idiot. He’s also a Mr. Nice Guy, which puts him in a world full of really bad situations. In the beginning of MY IDIOT BROTHER, Ned sells pot to an on-duty uniformed cop. He gets out of jail early on good behavior (won Most Cooperative four months running!) and has an unpleasant surprise waiting for him when  he comes home to his girlfriend - she’s moved on and is keeping his best friend, puppy dog Willie Nelson. Without a job and a home, Ned goes back home to live with his three sisters, accidentally causing chaos with each as he stays with them.

MY IDIOT BROTHER sets up like an episode of Curb Your Enthusiasm. Each time Ned stays with a sister, he’s accidentally put in very comically uncomfortable situations, with each becoming more hazardous than the last. With Ned being a hippie, he’s all about trying to do good, and he trusts people far too much which in turn, gets him in a lot of trouble. He’s a dreamer and is completely oblivious to that fact that people sometimes do asshole things. The three sisters (played by Elizabeth Banks, Zooey Dechanel, and Emily Mortimer) are afraid of facing truths, but understand the ass-holisms of people, which has made them emotionally dead from the big problems they’re currently facing.

We’ve seen Paul Rudd in plenty of comedies before - ANCHORMAN, WET HOT AMERICAN SUMMER, and I LOVE YOU, MAN to highlight some of his best - but his long-awaited time to headline has finally coming to full fruition. In MY IDIOT BROTHER, Rudd goes for broke and nails the stereotype that all hippies do is smoke pot and live off the fat of the land. He was born for this role. This leading character so likable and hilarious, a sequel wouldn’t be a bad idea.

Like a gay cousin, everyone has that sibling who is a constant fuck up. MY IDIOT BROTHER works so well because it was co-written and directed by a brother and sister. Jesse Peretz (director) and Evgenia Peretz (co-writer) understand the value of family and how sometime we take our siblings for granted. With life constantly moving so fast, sometimes it’s hard to think about the line  ”family first.”

My only qualm about the film is towards the third act, it starts to feel a bit long, even though it’s only a 95 minute feature. The situations become redundant and knowing what’s about to happen puts a dent in BROTHER’s laugh factor. This works for Curb Your Enthusiasm,because the episodes are short and after 10 very successful seasons (and still going), it seems as though creator Larry David wants the viewer to know what’s about to happen from the get-go.

Redundancy aside, it’s Rudd’s Ned who makes this movie worth the watch. He’s a charming guy who just can’t catch a break. In a genre where bonehead mistakes can kill the laughs, MY IDIOT BROTHER is very smart.

From the GATW Archives: Sundance 2011 Review: TAKE SHELTER

image

Rating: 5/5

Writer/DirectorJeff Nichols
CastMichael ShannonKaty MixonJessica Chastain
StudioSony Pictures Classics

Since I’ve been attending film festivals, there’s always been that one film that that leaves me slack-jawed. It sticks in my head for the duration of my stay, and all I want to do is talk about it. If time allows, I’ll catch a second or third screening of it. The fun part is taking fresh eyes with me, peeking at their reactions during certain parts, and talking about it as we exit the theater. This year at Sundance 2011, that film is Jeff Nichols’ TAKE SHELTER.

TAKE SHELTER questions dreams, faith, and trust, and challenges paranoia, fear, and anxiety. Curtis LaForche (Shannon) is living a fairly good life. He has a roof over his head, a good job as a crew chief for a sand mining company, a loving wife named Samantha (Jessica Chastain), and an adorable young daughter named Hannah (Tova Stewart). The only hiccup in their road is Hannah’s disability — she’s recently become deaf, and Curtis’ health insurance at his new job hasn’t kicked in just yet, and she needs a cochlear implant.

From the first shot in the film, Curtis starts having terrifying dreams. They start with a wicked storm, pouring rain that resembles motor oil, and they end with him awakening to screams and real pain. Each one gets progressively worse. Are they predicting the end of the world? Appearing so undeniably real, Curtis starts to confuse real life with the dream world.  As paranoia starts to take a toll, he begins to build a living quarters underground, risking his job security, marriage, and friends.

TAKE SHELTER stars Michael Shannon, which hammered a “sold” sign in my brain once I read he was attached. Shannon is the greatest underrated actor (have you seen him in THE RUNAWAYS? — powerful) we’ve ever had,  which is why it’s so wonderful to see him get top billing as he career continues. What makes him so great is those creepy eyes — he’s proven to the world that you don’t need a pretty face to have a solid acting career. I could watch this guy stare at a wall for 90 minutes and still be captivated. In TAKE SHELTER, he’s a six foot stick of star dynamite. When he walks into the tornado shelter for the first time, he just sits on a bench, looking around at the walls. We don’t know what he’s thinking, only that something big is about to happen. It’s captivating.

TAKE SHELTER displays Curtis and Samantha’s love for each other and Hannah through their actions. When Curtis comes home from work late, he still takes off his shoes at the back door so he won’t wake Hannah up. Samantha still whispers, even though they both know she can’t hear them. The love her as much as the universe allows. As for each other, their love is tested on multiple occasions and it’s up to them to stand by each other and show the world. When Curtis thinks he’s might be catching a mild-turned-major case of schizophrenia, love is really put on the thin ice. These nightmares haunt and eat at him.

TAKE SHELTER is proof that you don’t need to heavily rely on CGI to make a good story about the apocalypse. Yes, there is limited CGI in the film (digital hat nod to Hydraulx), but it’s only there to give our story a push. When we get to our visual effects scenes, it’s impressive. One scene in particular I will not spoil, but  know that it’s something you’d expect out of a Chris Nolan flick. This film though, is driven by its central characters, Curtis and Samantha. As mentioned above, Shannon has no problem keeping my interest. Neither did Chastain - she gives us her all as Samantha and it’s powerful. By the end of the film, we are aching to see The LaForche’s make it through everything.

This film is is not supposed to be focused on a possible apocalypse. This is a story about love, communication, and family. When TAKE SHELTER takes refuge in theaters sometime this year, grab your significant other’s hand, and lead them to see this.

From the GATW Archives: Interview: HAPPYTHANKYOUMOREPLEASE writer/director/actor Josh Radnor

image

Multihyphenate Josh Radnor is a rarity. So many films are made every year, but few that leave a powerful impression on its audience. Radnor’s directorial debut, HAPPYTHANKYOUMOREPLEASE, is one of those rare few films that left me in awe. I saw HTYMP two years ago when it premiered at Sundance, and I’ve since been waiting for the rest of the world to get a chance to see it, too. Starting this month, that’s about to happen, as HAPPYTHANKYOUMOREPLEASE is set for a theatrical release.

Last week, I interviewed Radnor over the phone - we dove really deeply into the making of HTYMP and shared our love for John Hughes, among other things. This was, without a doubt, one of the best interviews I’ve done in my GATW career. Radnor is really proud of and passionate about his work (as he should be) and he knows exactly what feelings he wants his audience to take away from this film.

Check out the full interview after the break.

Josh: Hey, you guys wrote such a nice review for us out of Sundance [2010], I really appreciate it. My producer Jesse just kept saying we gotta talk to those guys because they really seem to get the movie.

Chase: Yeah, we all fell in love with it when we saw it at Sundance. It speaks so much to people getting close to hitting 30 who’re still trying to figure out life. You know, when I was 18, I thought I’d be married with kids and a house when I was 28.

Josh: Haha, yeah.

I’m 28 now and I’m not close to any of that, haha.

Yeah, me neither, man, and I’m 36, so I hear ya.

Well, cool, man, let’s go ahead and jump into this because I know you have a busy day. The first thing I want to talk about is Annie and Sam’s friendship. It’s really rare to see a male and female have such a close friendship without any sexual tension. What inspired you and how did you develop that, because you nail it?

Oh, that’s cool, thanks. Well, it’s based on a friend of mine, which probably has something to do with that. One of the things when I was developing the script that I wanted to do was base a character on my friend and I had her blessing to do it. Sam’s not based totally on me, but there is something of the essence of my friendship with this girl that was important for me to have in the script. I think it’s true, in a lot of movies you don’t really see that male and female dynamic; I have just have a lot of friends who are women that I haven’t dated and will never date, probably. If I was going to do an honest portrait of what that time was like for me in New York, that’s an element of it. I just hinted at the fact that there can be crossed wires in those sorts of situations, but it was a scene that got cut. There was a scene that got that with Sam and Annie on the rooftop that was really one of my favorite scenes that just got in the way of the momentum of the story after while; it was a writing problem and not anything else. Annie is just tormented by the situations with these guys and how she can’t make it all work; Sam goes off on how great she is, and she says to him, “If I’m so great how come you never wanted to be with me?” It’s just this kind of awkward moment that was great and it will be on the DVD’s deleted scenes. I did want to address that because I also felt those things can get complicated. When people say that men and women can’t be friends I think that’s nonsense.

Yeah, that’s total bullshit. A lot of my staff are women and we’re just like best friends and family and I wouldn’t have it any other way. That’s why I wanted to talk to you about that because you rarely find that in movies.

Well, cool, I’m glad you zeroed in on that, because I think it’s an important but unspoken part of the movie. You know on some level the movie is about family, right? It’s about new families developing; Rasheen, Sam, and Mississippi get this kind of weird family going for a few days. There’s communities of people who develop in this cities where you know we’re not in these small villages or tribes anymore, but we do find our tribe, we do find our people, so to speak.

Absolutely. So, HAPPYTHANKYOUMOREPLEASE is one of those indie dramadies which seems to please different audiences - it’s really a mixed bag of humor and emotion. What were some of your influences in making the film?

What was up for me while I was writing [HTYMP] and getting set to direct was…I love Richard Linklater; you know, DAZED AND CONFUSED. For a while I was very unhealthily obsessed with BEFORE SUNRISE and BEFORE SUNSET. I like movies that allow people to talk…find the drama in the talking. I don’t carry a gun and spy on people…some of those movies, while they’re great fun, they don’t feel like my life or anyone I recognize. MAGNOLIA was a really big influence on me when I saw it, the intersecting storylines. I don’t have anything like frogs falling from the sky. He [P.T. Anderson] made me feel in that movie like you can do anything, people can burst into song. It just freed up my imagination as a filmmaker. I recently re-watched THE BREAKFAST CLUB on New Year’s Day with some high school friends, and talk about a movie that holds up. I remembered every frame of it and haven’t seen it in years but John Hughes generally and, that movie in particular, I think I underestimated the effect it had on my consciousness. Not to overstate things, but I think he taught a whole generation of people about empathy in the most basic way. I ended up reading a Vanity Fair piece after his death that really devastated me, I think he was a really special guy - time has been good to him and his movies.

Yeah, absolutely. When he passed, we did a dedication and all of my staff wrote about their favorite Hughes film and why and how it inspired them.

Oh, that’s cool, can I Google that? I’d love to see that.

Yeah, actually if you go to our site, it should be on the left side; there should be abanner for it.

Cool.

Going back to intertwining stories and MAGNOLIA being an inspiration - all the stories in HTYMP are all equally balanced. Is there any character you feel the film belongs to more or do you want it to all be equally balanced?

The balance was definitely a writing challenge and it was also an editing challenge. About 45-50 shots and edited footage didn’t end up in the final movie…so there was a lot of stuff that happened. When you’re editing a movie you’re essentially rewriting the movie. I once heard this thing a famous costume designer said, she said, “A costume isn’t finished when you’ve put every last thing on it that you can, it’s finished when you take every last thing off it that you can.” That - on some level you’re trying to pair it down to its essence. Sometimes in editing I would have written something that I learned in editing that the actor just gave to me in a look that I didn’t have to say the line of dialogue. And that’s where cinema is different than theatre because you can really get up close and a great film actor, you can tell what they’re thinking…I used to say that Annie was the heart of the film and I still believe that on some level, but also Rasheen is really important to me, but then I go around to every character. The culmination of Charlie and Mary Catherine’s storyline still devastates me when I see it, just because the bravery in how amazing they were in that, Zoey and Pablo. I think on some level Sam #2 (Tony Hale) is the hero of the movie, he’s the most emotionally evolved of all of them on some level; he knows who he is and knows what he wants and how to communicate it without all the veils and deflections. I guess when it comes to the characters I love all my kids equally. (laughs)

Haha, yeah, that’s a great answer. Okay, so going back to what I said earlier about how I thought I’d have it all figured out when I was 28 and I don’t, and you nailed how most people I know my age are currently going through. How much of this was taken from personal experiences in life?

I remember I was the class president of my high school so I gave the graduation speech. And the whole thrust of my graduation speech was, you know, people tell you this is the best time of your life and we should reject that. Even though this was a great place to go to high school it’s like, “remember the zits and not having the date for the Homecoming, remember how difficult it was.” I was 17 when I wrote this and I stand by it on some level, you know, I don’t want the best time of my life to have been in the past. Isn’t the goal to make every time the best time? One of the things I’ve hit on is in my later years (laughs) is kind of shifting focus, it’s a perception shift, not a circumstantial shift. That’s why gratitude became the theme of the  movie, it’s appreciated what’s going on right now. Everything right now is great, everything right now is perfect, everything I need is right here, and if you get there then everything is just great. We’re always trained in America to always be focusing on the future, right? But you’re never going ot get there. Where I am right now, if you told the 16 year old where I’d be, he’d be so psyched, but the me now can find all sorts of reasons to be dissatisfied. It’s just about shifting your perspective on things and I think I used to  share some of Sam restlessness and disatisfaction, but part of the movie in some ways was imposing the older, wiser perspective that I think I now have and am working towards having onto my younger idea of things. And while it’s not autobiographical, a lot of it is thematically true.

Right here is when our interview time was up and Radnor kindly asked if we could have a few more minutes.

Cool, I can give you one more good question - after someone sees the film, what would you like for them to take from it?

Well, that’s really up to them. I think it’s a really interesting question, if people are like, “do you think Sam and Mississippi stay together?,” I think that’s a really great conversation to have. There’s not a coda at the end that shows what happens to them and I kind of want your mind to wonder and wonder. If you’re actually concerned about the characters and where they’re headed, then I’ve done my job. I love movies where I feel altered, somehow, when I leave. I call it the “Post Good Movie Glow,” where you just feel completely different than when you sat down to watch the movie and it’s a particular magic that a good movie can work on you…I don’t think it’s my mission as a filmmaker to teach anyone anything, but if something I drop in a movie gives someone a different perspective on their life and eases things a bit, than that’s all fantastic.

happythankyoujoshradnormoreplease.

From the GATW Archives: Spot GATW in JANE EYRE, get a signed poster by director Cary Fukunaga and actors Mia Wasikowska and Michael Fassbender

Here’s the story (abridged version): we interviewed filmmaker Cary Fukunaga at SXSW ‘09 for his feature film, SIN NOMBRE. After the interview, I gave Cary a GATW sticker and he liked the logo so much, he signed a SIN NOMBRE poster promising he was going to put our sticker in his next film. Little did he know that his next film was going to be a period piece, but the man still stuck (get it?) with his word. Fukunaga emailed me on February 17th to let me know he did, in fact, put the GATW logo in JANE EYRE. He couldn’t use the actual sticker, of course, for obvious reasons, but he did put our logo somewhere in the film. He explained the difficulties of it and how he learned a valuable lesson: “never promise to put a sticker in your next film.”

As badly as I wanted to share the entire email (it’s full of nice things - Fukunaga is a wonderful man), I had to hold off so I could give our readers a chance at winning an autographed poster of JANE EYRE, signed by Fukunaga and actors Mia Wasikowska and Michael Fassbender. But our good friend Weston Green of MakingOf spotted the logo in the film during his first viewing of it. In an interview with Fukunaga the next day, Green brought up the logo’s presence in the film, and proceeded to gift Fukunaga with a number of items for use in his next film. It’s a hilarious interview, and is just another amusing part of one of the best GATW experiences we’ve had to date.

Here’s how we’re going to do the contest: 1) go see JANE EYRE and fill out the form below telling us where the GATW logo is in the film. Describe the scene as much as possible (who’s in it, what they’re doing, etc.). Also, watch the video below and tell us how many beanies the interviewer (the amazing Weston Green) gives Fukunaga. Deadline ends at 11:59 PM on April 1st. On April 2, we will select a winner via random drawing and notify them by email and announcing on the site. Good luck, movie lovers!

JANE EYRE opens Friday in NY and LA and expands wider on March 18th.