Review: THE INBETWEENERS Is Filthy and Fun: Go See it Naked


Full disclosure: I have not seen "The Inbetweeners" TV show, for which this film serves as the series finale. I did, however, do extensive research (Wikipedia) prior to watching the film, and I’m fully aware there are some inside jokes I may have not picked up on.

Best friends Will (Simon Bird), Jay (James Buckley), Neil (Blake Harrison), and Simon (Joe Thomas) have a really hard life. And when we say “hard,” we mean they live in an upper-class suburban neighborhood, their parents have really good marriages (except for Will’s, but we’ll get to that) and they’ve just graduated high school.

To catch you up to speed, Simon’s girlfriend just dumped him, Will’s dad just remarried his 22-year-old ex-wife (they only invited 100 close friends and family, and Will wasn’t included) and Jay spends too much time masturbating to online porn using, yes, sliced ham as lubricant. This strange ritual also involves him wearing gloves, goggles and a snorkel. (Yeah, it gets weird.)

These three think their privileged lives currently suck and want to give adulthood a shot. So they (along with a bored Neil) plan a trip to Malia (paid in full by their parents) in hopes of getting (no surprise here) more vagina than Dirk Diggler (if you don’t get that reference, just know it’s a lot). These four teenagers are hungry for sex and manhood.

The goal of “The Inbetweeners” is to mock movie cliches while being a movie cliche itself. Stereotypes herein include (but are not limited to): bullies, road-trips-gone-wrong, mean principals, physical comedy, jerk dads, life lessons, drunken mayhem and an over-the-top ending. However, the main focus throughout is embarrassing, relentless and unsuccessful acts of sex. Some of the boys’ standards drop drastically while Neil’s completely vanish; take a moment and think of the most repulsive sex act you possible can and know that it’s probably in the movie. Mission accomplished! (BTW, you have a very dirty mind.)

The only frustrating thing about “The Inbetweeners” is the boys’ thick English accents — subtitles would have been incredibly helpful. An additional possible nitpick is their overbearing use of British slang, but we won’t fault them for our lack of knowledge when it comes to foreign dialect.

That said, if you’re a fan of the short-lived series, head to the theater (make sure to purposely sit in the the middle to be ironic) and see “The Inbetweeners.” You’re craving for cinematic filth will be fulfilled.

Originally written and posted on NextMovie.com.

Interview: Mike Birbiglia Invites Us to SLEEPWALK WITH ME

If you listen to the podcast “This American Life” regularly, funny man Mike Birbiglia is a household name to you. You may not ever be able to pronounce his last name, but you’ll definitely remember his bizarre true stories about his wonderful, horrible life. It’s hard to forget a guy who tells about the time he sleepwalked himself out the second floor window of a La Quinta.

Birbigilia took his sleepwalking woes and made a hit one-man Off-Broadway show about it called “Sleepwalk With Me.” Shortly after, he made a live stand-up record and wrote a book of the same name. His sh*t luck was good luck, and the continued success of this act pushed him to make a feature about it called — you guessed it — “Sleepwalk With Me.”

I met up with Birbigilia at USC, who was there screening the film for Leonard Maltin’s screenwriting class. Before the Q&A started, we sat outside on a fancy bench (USC seriously is a dashing campus) to talk about the film.

So you were sleepwalking once and you jumped out of a two-story window.

Yeah.

How does it feel to be the world’s first accidental action star comedian?

[laughs] That’s funny, actually. Joss Whedon, Ira Glass and I were joking about that the other night that the obvious, logical extension is to have the sleepwalking character in “The Avengers 2″ but I don’t know what his signature would be other than jumping through the window.

He would be the George Reeves [who played Superman in 1952] where he just jumps through the wall and just saves someone right when they need to be saved.

That’s right. Well it’s funny because I actually do think in some odd way the action aspect of the film is what propels it from being a simple rom-com into something that has life or death stakes to it. Which is what makes it a little bit of a hybrid.

I’m glad you said that because I’m going to bring up the more serious tone in a little bit … so “Sleepwalk With Me” was a one-man show, you wrote a book about it, and it was a live stand-up album. Now you’ve made a feature film of it –- how did you mix up the jokes verbatim from the act while adding fresh material for the fans that are familiar with the book, album and show?

Sleepwalk With MeI feel like when we were adapting scenes, whenever it was possible, we would just try to fill things out. Truthfully, it was making visuals of the jokes. The scene with the Colleen agent. The scene was in a lot of ways expositional. He shows up and she says, “I don’t have anything for you,” and he says, “I’ll take anything.” Then she says, “Well, I have this one thing but nobody would want it,” and he says, “I’ll take that.” We were photo storyboarding with our cinematographer and it became clear not enough was happening. So I call Joe Birbiglia, one of the screenwriters on the team, and asked if he could come up with some kind of visual that could supplement that scene. He came back with the popcorn concept with the headshot cone she puts the popcorn in. [laughs] I think it’s brilliant — it’s one of my favorite moments in the movie. A lot of it comes out of necessity and the next thing you know it becomes a memorable scene.

Also, one of the best things about the film is the cast. You get the pressure of the dad because James Rebhorn is so good and you get the pressure from Abby [his girlfriend in the film, played by Lauren Ambrose] because Lauren is so real. She plays it so real and you get why he [Matt, Birbiglia’s character] feels guilt and you feel what he feels. And that’s what makes it worth watching on the screen versus the other forms.

That’s one of the scenes from the film that stands out in my mind — Matt is so excited to get this gig and she’s just excited to eat her popcorn. [laughs] It’s just funny how that works out.

[laughs] He’s just so naive to how bad a situation is.

The film is extremely relatable. Your character is this struggling comedian with a lot of heart and determination and that’s what’s so relatable. With you being a comedian, how hard is it to poke fun at the most hardest moments in your life, including times when you’ve been a complete jerk?

It’s definitely not the easiest thing to do. When it was a one-man show, the cheating story for example, I had that story in my notepad for a year before I had the gall to put it on stage because I knew the audience would hate me. And, they did. [laughs] It was nuancing it over time to try to find the humanity in there that made it work eventually. It ultimately works in the film because I spent so much time with it, figuring out how to make that relatable. I think it’s one of the most important parts of the film. What I always studied in screenwriting from my mentor John Glavin was that the most interesting characters are characters with shades of gray. It’s hard to do that autobiographically. I’m a comedian and want to be liked and that’s not something that makes people like you.

Something that really breaks the tension is when you look at the camera and say, “Remember you are on my side.” I loved that. It feels like it’s this generation’s “Ferris Bueller.”

I hope so! [laughs] Because of last week, it’s starting to feel like it might become bigger than anything I could possibly do.

It was a hit when it played at one theater in New York last weekend.

We beat “The Avengers.” I don’t know if you’ve followed the joke but we beat Whedon’s per screen average. His per screen average is 47 and ours is 68 but he was on 4,800 screens and we were on one. We were yelling, “We declare victory! We will pull our resources with ‘The Avengers’ and together we will make three billion dollars and split it 50/50. That’s our declaration.” [laughs]

We’ll see how it goes this weekend when it goes to 29 theaters. It’s a big question of, “Is everyone going to have this [positive] response?” It’s exciting.

Going back to the serious tone of the movie, the one thing that this movie shows is that great relationships don’t always work out.

Yes!

In the end, Abby tells you she never left you because she didn’t want to break your heart. That’s something that a lot of people have experienced. Why do you think it’s important to tell it that way versus the traditional “We just broke up and went our separate ways” Hollywood ending?

Sleepwalk With MeActually, that monologue came out of the edit because we felt like there was something missing. Me, Seth Barrish, Geoffrey Richman our editor and Ira [Glass] banged our heads against the wall thinking about what are real things that happen in my life that can encapsulate the feeling of this breakup — what’s relatable about it, what’s universal about it — so we shot that. That was actually true to my life and it actually came out in post. Sometimes I don’t like to tell people that because I want people to experience it as I experience it. When my ex-girlfriend saw the movie, she was really touched by it. She said, “It’s amazing how in life you never get to see the other side of a breakup.” She felt really lucky in a certain way because part of her life was encapsulated. It’s funny because some people have said this week in different articles [that] I’m being unfair to my ex-girlfriend. She saw it, loved it and said, “I feel so lucky we broke up because it was the wrong thing for both of us.”

That’s one thing I admired about the film is the relationship because it was a great relationship and it just didn’t work out. It was great watching it because it’s something the audience isn’t used to seeing.

One of the lines that was in the early drafts of the one-man show that always felt on the nose was, “Sometimes you meet the right person at the wrong time.” And I just feel like that’s so true. It’s true with so many things — jobs, friendships and deep relationships. Timing is everything.

I couldn’t agree more.

I love your mom tattoo. It’s badass.

Oh, thank you. I actually got it about five weeks ago. My mom is actually flying in tomorrow and has never been to L.A. before. I’m taking her all over over L.A. — she made me book a TMZ bus tour and she’s so excited about that.

Oh my God — no way. That is going to be unreal.

So yeah, thank you. She’s the reason why I’m sitting here in front you of — she’s supported my passion for movies my whole life. She even took me to see “Terminator 2″ in the third grade so I owe her a lot.

“Terminator 2″ is so good. I love it.

So talking about Ira Glass, he’s produced a lot of great stories on “This American Life.” What do you think it was about “Sleepwalk With Me” that influenced him to want to co-write and produce a feature about one of the stories?

Sleepwalk With MeHe says I tricked him. [laughs] He says I lured him into a Steve Jobs-esque reality of distortion field. He says that about me, that I was like, “C’mon, let’s make a movie, it’ll be fun,” and it made him feel like it would be fun. Then cut to “Oh no! We have no idea what we’re doing. What the hell’s going to happen?” [laughs] He says it’s a perfect story to make cinematic because it has dreams and sleepwalking and it has a metaphor that’s literal. [laughs] How often do you have that?

I love it. So, let’s talk about your character Matt. He’s trying to find his voice as a comedian and he finds it through trial and error and that’s how it works for a comedian.

Of course, yeah.

How much trial and error did you have with the “Sleepwalk With Me” material until you finally found its niche? I remember you were saying that some of the audience hated you during the cheating sketch. When was the transition when you knew it was all going to work?

This is so crazy — I started writing the one-man show “Sleepwalk With Me” in 2003. So many years ago. It took me about five years of working on it before we took it Off Broadway and another two years before we made it into a film, so it was a lot of failure. I was trying out a lot of material at stand-up comedy clubs. I’m telling a story about cheating on my ex-girlfriend at a comedy club in a comedy club. People at comedy clubs don’t like that story too much because they’re like, “Hey, we’re trying to just enjoy our drinks and not think about what we’ve done wrong.” [laughs] It was definitely hard and there were setbacks.

I always had a sense of destiny that storytelling was going to return in comedy. Richard Pryor was one of the great storytellers in the 70s and ’80s, and then we went into a Seinfeld-era kind of comedy. I always thought it would come back because ultimately it’s a very human form of comedy. Cut to here I am and one of the most popular shows is Louis C.K.’s show, which is completely a comedian doing personal storytelling material. I feel like I had a revelation a few years ago and a bunch of other comedians had it simultaneously. It feels like a movement, but because we’re comedians we’re not organized. We don’t talk to each other about it. [laughs]

Louis C.K. and Larry David will be very proud after seeing this movie.

I hope so.

Watching your self-deprecating comedy made me feel so much more comfortable about all the hang-ups I’ve had in my life. What I love about “Sleepwalk With Me” is that it’s follows a guy with the worst luck and by the end of the film I want to be him because of his determination.

Wow, thanks. That makes me feel great.

“Sleepwalk With Me” opens in over 25 cities today. Get your tickets here.

Originally posted on Film.com.

Review: SLEEPWALK WITH ME Destined to Be a Sleeper Hit

Things aren’t going well for aspiring comedian Matt Pandamiglio (played by co-writer-director Mike Birbiglia) in the self-deprecating comedy that would make both Larry David and Louis C.K. proud,"Sleepwalk With Me."

Matt’s just been strong-armed into moving in with his ultra-supportive, under-appreciated girlfriend (the gingerly cool Lauren Ambrose), who wants marriage and a baby carriage. He’s also not exactly in high demand at the local comedy club — his best opportunities there are mopping the bathroom floors, serving drinks and filling in as a comic when the headliner is late or doesn’t show up. He’s the standup comic version of an aspiring boxer who serves as a punching bag for the guy training to win that champion belt.

There’s also one major issue about Matt that becomes the giant pink elephant in the room — he suffers from a rare sleepwalking disorder. And he doesn’t just say a few words before eventually going back to sleep; he climbs on top of tall pieces of furniture, tries to fight laundry baskets and jumps out the second floor windows of motels. This is an issue everyone takes seriously except for Matt, who’s too busy driving from one gig to another in an attempt to better his stand-up routine.

Co-written and produced by Ira Glass of “This American Life,” “Sleepwalk With Me” is based on Birbiglia’s wonderful, horrible real life. The film got its roots in his comedy albums that focus on the bad luck he’s had throughout the years. He does suffer from a bizarre sleepwalking disorder and really did jump out of a two-story hotel window once.

Lucky for us, Birbiglia turns his painful real-life experiences — like getting window glass removed from his leg — into a comedy routine. And it’s a lot funnier than it sounds. Birbiglia adapted his album “Sleepwalk With Me” into a one-man stage show in New York presented by the legendary Nathan Lane and followed that with the book “Sleepwalk With Me & Other Painfully True Stories,” which ended up on the New York Times bestseller list.

A number of Birbiglia’s comedy albums, including “Sleepwalk” and “My Secret Public Journal Live,” are used verbatim throughout the film. For the die-hard fans reading this, don’t worry — there’s a lot of new material, including charming side stories (we applaud Birbiglia and his team for casting Carole Kane and James Rebhorn as his constantly-arguing parents — it’s actually kind of precious) and pleasing cameos. Alex Kapovsky pops up (and, to no one’s surprise, he’s a pretentious prick), and the highly-underused Kristen Schaal sneaks in as the president of a once-popular karaoke club. She comes dangerously close to stealing the movie with maybe two minutes of screen time.

Birbiglia’s style of comedy isn’t anything you haven’t seen or heard before, but his methods of portrayal truly sell the film. He breaks the fourth wall a la “Ferris Bueller’s Day Off” and his character eventually finds a way to please a crowd by making fun of his relationship woes. His girlfriend wants to get married and have babies; he just wants to find a good place to get cereal. She fears she’ll lose him to another woman; he fears bears. How non-seriously he takes his serious relationship of eight years is strangely very entertaining. He finally learns he has to laugh at himself and enjoy ripping apart embarrassing and private moments of his own life in front of an audience to get the kind of laughter a comic needs to keep their career healthy.

It was a smart move for Birbiglia to ride out the success of the several incarnations of “Sleepwalk With Me” by adapting it as a feature film. This is arguably the funniest film of 2012 to date; it should come with a label saying “Warning: You will injure yourself with laughter while watching this movie.”

Published on NextMovie.

GATW Appears in JANE EYRE, with Michael Fassbender and Mia Wasikowska

One time I was in a movie called JANE EYRE, kind of. Below is the kind and endearing email from the film’s director, Cary Fukunaga (SIN NOMBRE), explaining why GordonandtheWhale.com’s logo appears in the film, and a screenshot of where said cameo takes place. This one was of the defining moments in my career as a journalist when I thought, “I must be doing something right.” 

image

The GATW sticker I gave him:

image

And here’s the screenshot from the film. This takes place toward the end when St John Rivers (Jamie Bell) is talking to Jane Eyre (Mia Wasikowska) in the school’s classroom. What  a cool moment in my life.

image

My pal Weston Green even conducted a hilarious interview with Fukunaga about it.

(Note: Fukunaga’s email was posted after getting his blessing. He’s a really, really nice guy.)

Q&A: Jean-Claude Van Damme Kicks It With Us, Talks Villainy, Sequels & Remakes


Being a villain is hardly new territory for Jean-Claude Van Damme: He started his career as the bad guy in “No Retreat, No Surrender” and “Black Eagle.” Then, good fortune came his way and he was cast in a little movie called, “Bloodsport.” The rest is history.

A few days ago, we went round-for-round with the Muscles from Brussels himself, JCVD, to discuss his role as the rogue in Sylvester Stallone’s new male pattern badness adventure, "The Expendables 2."

Not only does JCVD talk about the upcoming “Bloodsport” remake, “Double Impact 2,” and the signature roundhouse kicks he performs in “The Expendables 2,” he gets up, moves furniture and shows with passionate detail how his kicks are done and why they work. Nothing ever prepares you for moments like this.

Getty Images

Welcome back to the big screen. We’ve missed you a lot.
Thank you sir. I don’t know if [“The Expendables 2”] is going to help me but what do you think?

I want it to. But I have “Bloodsport” framed at my house.
You never know in Hollywood. They’re going to do a remake of “Bloodsport.”

Yeah that’s the rumor.
The guy who wrote “Taken” is writing and the producer is [Ed] Pressman. I want to be in the film as a trainer and I don’t think the writer wants [me] to.

His loss, man.
Nah, he knows that “Bloodsport” is a big film so he wants to get credit with all of that, you know what I’m saying? Like Will Smith, for example, was smart to [cast] Jackie Chan [in “Karate Kid 2010”] — it’s kind of cool. When I did the first “Bloodsport,” it was an independent company and [they] didn’t want bankruptcy so they sold the title all over the place — 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 “Bloodsports”  — the remake, I would love to be in. It’s kind of painful but maybe they’ll change their minds. That would be great because I can still kick better than anybody here today.

Let’s talk about that. In “The Expendables 2” you do your signature roundhouse kick. As you’re getting older, do you find it difficult or do you feel like you’ve still got it?
Here was the deal, because of the age and everything, they told me, “Don’t worry, we’re going to cover you well. You’re going to jump and we’ll do a cut.” And I told them, “But guys, let me do the full kick.” They were kind of surprised that I could still do it and I said, “Yeah, it’s the same as before. I’m going to try.”

Jean-Claude Van Damme in "The Expendables 2"
Lionsgate

I [have been] doing it at the gym so I warmed up with the Bengay and everything and I stretched before the kick. And then I did my full kick the first time … I wanted to go a little more snappy and then I did it [again] the second time and it was no problem. You know that roundhouse kick. And then I have another kick [in the film] and it was like one shot. And then I [needed to do] ADR in Belgium and I’ve got Stallone on the phone and I said, “Sly, I don’t get it … I spent all of that time to do that kick and I asked those guys to put one angle so you can see the full kick like in “Bloodsport.” All we see is like me going like this.” [At this point, Van Damme gets up to pantomime the kick he’s referring to].

From the foot touching the knife. It’s like “BOOM!” and me landing. So I said to Sly, “What are you doing?” And he said “Let me go check in the cutting room,” because he was busy doing another movie. Then he sent me an email saying, “It’s arranged.” I haven’t seen the movie but basically I throw a knife in the air, Scott [Adkins] catches the knife. As soon as the knife was in the air, I didn’t even wait and I did the famous roundhouse kick.

Sylvester Stallone and Jean-Claude Van Damme
Getty Images

Technically “JVCD” was your big return, but “Expendables 2” is your big return to the action genre. Did you have any hesitations with playing a villain for your comeback or were you just like, “Let’s do it”?
I said, “Let’s do it.” I said to Sly, “What about me playing the villain?” … My father told me, “Be an Expendable, don’t try this and that,” and I said, “Dad, I want to be a villain again.” … Sly loved the idea of me being the villain. But I know it’s only one time, right? So, I don’t know the outcome. Hopefully the studio will like it but that’s what I wanted to do.

What is the biggest change you’ve noticed in the action genre since you first started?
The technical came in — the CGI, the cables, all of that stuff. … With action, you have to be physical because, if you’re not, how can you do it? … With “The Expendables,” we have those groups of people who build their career like that, with those physical moves, without CGI and this and this and that … One film like that every two years where the action stars are going [at it] like the old times — that’s what I believe makes “The Expendables 2” special.

"The Expendables" franchise is a play on older action stars, that they still got "it" and they’re not going anywhere. Do you think there is a time when an action star should throw in the towel and pass the torch?
You know, you have to keep on going. It’s what we have inside of us that’s how we became famous, and it will never die. Look at Clint Eastwood for an example — he keeps on moving the best that he can, it’s great. Don’t give up. Plus we need that to have a nice life, I need to train. Sometimes I did have my life of the Rock ‘n’ Roll life. I fell down, I crashed and came back. Because of training every day or every other day depending on the traveling, the jet lag and everything, we can be this way. If I didn’t have that, I would be very depressed. If I don’t train for a week, I build toxins in my body and I sweat easily. It’s strange.

You’ve been immortalized  on screen as the hero and now you’re going to be immortalized as the villain. How does that feel?
It scares me. I directed a movie and that’s why I wasn’t able to be in “The Expendables.” We heard all types of [bogus gossip] stories - me and Jet Li fighting and all of that stuff; I’ve never even met Jet Li in my life. Hopefully we will meet in China because we might be doing a film together … But, I was cutting [the film I directed] and was responsible because I put my own money into that film and it’s a very strange movie. So [I didn’t do “The Expendables”] because I was busy cutting this film - we had to do additional shoots in Bulgaria and then I did a comedy called “Welcome to the Jungle”  — you have to see it, I play so dumb.

And then I starred in a film with Peter Hyams, the director of “Timecop,” who made me play a villain. But really a villain, like villain.  But I fight, you know when you fight you’re busy with your movement, so when you punch you go [shows how he punches] “BRUUUM!” and you go like “BAHM!” with grace. It was a great, great villain. So I’m doing three movies as a villain. Hopefully  I will not be categorized as a villain for the rest of my life [laughs].

Jean-Claude Van Damme in "Double Impact"
Stone Group Pictures

Picasso had his blue period - this is your villain period. Let’s go back to your “Double Impact” days. In an all-out brawl again, who would win in a fight Chad or Alex?
Alex.

I was hoping you’d say Chad. He’s got the legs!
Yeah but Alex has the headbutt! “Mr. California, Mr. Silk underwear… BOOM!”

I have no franchise. I lost “Bloodsport,” “Lionheart,” I told you “Double Impact” [would be] a great franchise because today Chad would be like the guy in “JCVD” and Alex would be the guy like “The Expendables” and, with the experience with the acting, I came up with a great story set in Los Angeles. He’s playing a producer, making pictures with a big house behind him. Alex is gonna go on vacation and has some problems with the Triads. Why?  Because Chad went to Hong Kong and to get some money using [Alex’s] face, all of that bulls**t. Alex comes [to Los Angeles] to see Chad and he’s full of s**t, has a girl pregnant and she’s the sister of the big boss from South Central. It’s like “Double Impact” in Los Angeles.

That’s amazing.
Yeah, I wrote the script with a friend of mine, Sheldon. He did “Bloodsport” and “Double Impact” with me. Hopefully, somebody smart enough, like an agent or a producer, can put that back together … I’m excited about it, you know?

Originally posted on MTV’s NextMovie.com

JCVD: 'Double Impact 2' Script Is Written

"Double Impact" is arguably one of action legend Jean-Claude Van Damme’s best films, for two reasons: It’s got double the Van Dammage and another face-off against the great Bolo Yeung (who played his "Bloodsport" nemesis).

When we met JCVD last week, we took the opportunity to ask him about the “Double Impact” days — and Van Damme began to gush about the possibility of  a sequel.

"I wrote the script with a friend of mine Sheldon - He [co-wrote] "Bloodsport" and "Double Impact" with me," he told us. "Hopefully, somebody smart enough, like an agent or a producer, can put that back together…I’m excited about it, you know?"

One of the things Van Damme stressed was the lack of franchises in his career: “I have no franchise. I lost ‘Bloodsport,’ ‘Lionheart.’”

“‘Double Impact’ [would be] a great franchise,” he told us, explaining how he thinks his twin characters Chad and Alex might have evolved. “Today, Chad would be like the guy in ‘JCVD’ and Alex would be the guy like ‘The Expendables.’”

"I came up with a great story set in Los Angeles. [Chad] is a producer, making pictures with a big house behind him. Alex is gonna go on vacation and has some problems with the Triads. Why?  Because Chad went to Hong Kong and to get some loan money using [Alex’s] face, all of that bulls**t. And Alex comes [to Los Angeles] to see Chad and he’s full of s**t, has a girl pregnant, and she’s the sister of the big boss from South Central. It’s like ‘Double Impact’ in Los Angeles."

Van Damme did and still does have a franchise — the “Universal Soldier” series — but he did try to bring the original’s magic back with “Universal Solider: Regeneration.” Even Dolph Lundgren came back,  but the film still went straight-to-DVD. He’s just completed “Universal Solider: Day of Reckoning” with Lundgren (apparently Sgt. Andrew Scott will not stay dead.) and is slated for a November 30th theatrical release. It looks like his involvement in “The Expendables 2” is already starting to pay off.

Hopefully, we are going to Feel the Impact once more. Give us this, Hollywood.

Written on MTV’s NextMovie.com

Jean-Claude Van Damme: I Want To Be a Shidoshi in 'Bloodsport' Remake

Unless you’ve been stranded on an island somewhere remote, you already know the Mussels from Brussels, Jean-Claude Van Damme, is set to make a comeback as an action star. In just a few weeks, you’ll be able to see him on the big screen — for the first time since his very first role in 1986, it’ll be (again) as the villain — in “The Expendables 2.”

We recently spoke with JCVD during his “Expendables” press tour, and before we worked through his feelings on being immortalized as a villain, we got a chance to discuss the “Bloodsport” remake. Internet rumors that Van Damme has the blues over the movie are true, it turns out.

"I want to be in the film as a trainer and I don’t think the writer wants [me] to … he knows that ‘Bloodsport’ is a big film so he wants to get credit with all of that — you know what I’m saying?"

Now, we understand why the writer might not want Van Damme in the picture — with JCVD involved, he would certainly steal a majority of the spotlight — but the idea of putting him as Frank Dux’s trainer  (originally played by Roy Chiao as Senzo Tanaka, whom he called Shidoshi) would really roundhouse kick up the movie’s buzz.

"When I did the first ‘Bloodsport,’" he told us, "it was an independent company and [they] didn’t want bankruptcy, so they sold the title all over the place - 2,3,4,5,6 ‘Bloodsports.’ The remake, I would love to be in it.  It’s kind of painful, but maybe they’ll change their minds. That would be great because I can still kick better than anybody here today."

You can’t argue with that. Hollywood, are you listening?

Follow Chase Whale on Twitter.

Comic-Con 2012: ‘The Expendables 2′ Panel Recap

Stallone and Schwarzenegger, two stars who don’t even need first names, took the stage in Hall H today to present some exclusive footage for “The Expendables 2,” or what Stallone referred to as “male pattern badness.” Their costars and fellow action heroes Dolph Lundgren, Terry Crews, and Randy Couture also joined them onstage during the panel, making the giant convention hall a veritable soup of testosterone.

The panel kicked off with  a trailer for “The Expendables 2,” followed by a colorful Stallone retrospective. All the boys took the stage — well, everyone except for Arnie. Before the former Governator took the stage, we were treated to an equally awesome Schwarzenegger retrospective. Finally, the Terminator took the stage and grumbled in the mike, “I’m back!”  to wild cheering and mad Tweeting.

One of the most interesting things about the panel was Stallone’s frank talk about aging action stars. Along with most of his costars, this is a guy who went from having a huge career with roles in seminal films like “Rocky” and “First Blood” to more forgettable flicks like “Tango and Cash” and “Judge Dredd.” Eventually, though, his star began to dim. Hollywood didn’t really understand what to do with action stars once they were deemed too old and Stallone recognized that. He knew he wanted to make “The Expendables” a successful franchise about those aging stars, but he couldn’t and wouldn’t do it alone. Schwarzenegger, Bruce Willis, Jean-Claude Van Damme, Chuck Norris and other class action acts had to be involved in order to make his vision work.

Watching Stallone and Schwarzenegger chat about how they met, their careers and why it was so important that they finally worked together was one for the books. The two met at the Golden Globes years ago when Stallone was picking up a few statues for “Rocky,” and ever since then, both have been in hot competition to be the biggest and the baddest. “Sly’s killed 288 people, I’ve killed 289,” Arnold told the crowd, albeit in the most loving way.

When talking about the younger cast members like Crews, Couture and Liam Hemsworth (who was not present), Schwarzenegger and Stallone were full of praise. Stallone’s biggest excitement about bringing all of these boys together is their diverse talents in their respective fields of fighting style. In the most bromantic moment of the panel, Arnold gushed over his love for Crews’ muscles. When a fan in the crowd asked the boys who’d win in a fit, Stallone was quick to answer “Randy Couture,” before going into detail about Couture’s fighting prowess and how realistic his scenes are.

Before the panel was over, Stallone showed us what looks like to be part of the big action scene in the film. It’s at an airport and our Expendables are blowing away bodies left and right as Barney Ross (Stallone) takes off after villainous Jean Vilain (Van Damme) for what appears to be their much-anticipated fight scene. Stallone wanted a challenge, a villain who could threaten all the heroes in his movie, and he got him.

“I think we pulled off something pretty remarkable,” Sly had commented earlier. Chances are good that action fans will think so, too.

This article was originally written on Film.com

Review: TAKE THIS WALTZ Is a Remarkable, Offbeat Love Story

Take This Waltz
Magnolia Pictures

In "Take This Waltz," Margot (Michelle Williams) has a good life. She’s happily married to Lou (Seth Rogen), the successful author of a chicken cookbook, and they’re living comfortably. If you were a fly on the wall in their home, you’d assume this young couple was so passionate for each other that their young romance would last ‘till death do them part. But something soon seems off with Margot. She’s empty inside.

Coming home from a business trip, she meets Daniel (Luke Kirby), a passionate painter who makes ends meet as a rickshaw driver. Margot and Daniel immediately hit it off, transcending into an unconventional friendship farther than she and Lou could ever reach. She starts to fall for Daniel, but fights — hard — to resist the temptation of getting physically and mentally involved with another man. As the days go by, the temptation gets harder and the emptiness grows. “Take This Waltz” is a remarkable, offbeat love story about how not all perfect romances have a fairy tale beginning or end.

"Take This Waltz" asks questions and challenges true love. Can someone be happily married and fall deeply in love for someone else? Will it be easy? Margot and Lou’s relationship seem so perfect. Throughout the film, they show their undying love by telling each other horrifically cute things like, “I just bought a new melon baller and I’d like to gouge out your eyeballs with it,” followed quickly by, “I love you so much.” When the heart wants something else, this tactic doesn’t work anymore.

Also Check Out: Q&A: Michelle Williams Doesn’t Want You to Settle

Michelle Williams as the lead no longer has anything to prove. She’s one of the few who broke away from teen idol typecasting (does anyone actually remember her anymore from “Dawson’s Creek”?) to become one of the most prolific working actors currently working. That said, the staggering performances in this movie are from Seth Rogen and Sarah Silverman. They both come from a background of filthy comedy and take their stab at, for once, being taken seriously. And they both do this without flaw. Silverman plays Geraldine, a recovering alcoholic who bides her time by taking exercise swimming courses with the elderly at a local YMCA. Lou is a kind-hearted man who sees the big picture on marriage — it might be a slow burn at times, but it’s supposed to last a lifetime. It’s exciting to know how far of a range these two actors have.

"Take This Waltz" is an unconventional look at the new and wondrous feeling of falling in love. It’s not always easy, especially in Margot’s case, but writer and director Sarah Polley has made it look beautiful. In the end, this film is all about Polley and what this promising director is capable of. We congratulate her for showing romance in a new and daring way.

This article was written on MTV’s NextMovie.com

Next Factor Q&A: 'Beasts of the Southern Wild' Star Quvenzhané Wallis

Quevenzhane Wallis
Getty Images

We can now take “interview a nine-year-old about a movie” off our bucket list. Recently we sat down with the adorable and charismatic  Quvenzhané Wallis, who stars as little warrior Hushpuppy in the Sundance hit"Beasts of the Southern Wild." It’s difficult to describe “Beasts” — a film set in the mythical community of Bathtub off the coast of Louisana — in a way that isn’t confusing, but we can tell you it’s one of the most magical movies you’ll ever see in your lifetime.

We caught up with Wallis (who was accompanied by her mother) at the Four Seasons in Beverly Hills to talk about the movie and some of her favorite things in life. 

Tell us about Hushpuppy.
Hushpuppy is a brave little girl who lives with her father in the Bathtub and tries to follow her father’s footsteps.

Talk about the process of how you got the part — how you heard about the first audition, all the way to getting the part.
Whenever the audition came, my mom told me, “Let’s get into the car and let’s go to the library.” So we went to the library and we did the audition, and they said they liked what they seen. And when they called back they said they liked what they seen and that they were looking for [my sister], and my mom said, “Oh, you must be looking for Quvenzhané,” and they were like, “No, no, no, no,” and they almost hung up. So my mom [said], “Oh, she must have told you Nazie is her nickname, but her real name is Quvenzhané.”

So the movie revolves all around your character, which means you are carrying a lot of the weight. How nervous were you once you started shooting?
I wasn’t as nervous, I was actually excited.

Also Check Out: Our 20 Favorite Films From Sundance 2012

What’s your favorite scene in the movie?
Birds screaming and crawfish.

How about telling me about your favorite moment on set.
Whenever we did the crawfish. And the crabs and the shrimp.

Let’s talk about your experiences at the film festivals you’ve been to. This had its world premiere at Sundance — talk about that experience.
Being at Sundance was the first time we got awards, and that was the first day I realized the movie was special.

A few weeks ago you were at the Cannes Film Festival, which is one of the most prestigious festivals in the world. What was it like seeing yourself on giant screen at the Palais?
It [felt] like a bigger me with a smaller voice with a smaller me with a bigger voice.

How many times have you answered that?
A thousand times. [laughs]

What else did you do at Cannes besides see your own movie?
I saw the beaches and things like that.

Hushpuppy is very strong and independent young lady. How much do you relate to her?
She takes care of her father, she has animals. She likes to explore the world. And she [has] different things that she can do. We both like to take care of our fathers. We both like to explore the world. We both like animals, and we like to complete mysteries.

This is your first movie, and it happens to be your breakout role. How cool does this feel?
It feels good to do a movie, but I will always feel the same.

What’s your favorite movie?
“Happy Feet 2.”

What’s your favorite animal?
A dog.

What kind of dog?
Chihuahua.

What kind of music do you listen to?
Hip-hop.

LAFF 2012 INTERVIEW: THE WONDERFULLY WEIRD WAYNE WHITE AND BEAUTY IS EMBARRASSING DIRECTOR NEIL BERKELEY

A few days ago I was talking to BEAUTY IS EMBARRASSING’s director Neil Berkeley on Twitter about setting up an interview. I saw the film a few days ago and it’s unquestionably one of the best of the fest. Two days later, we bump into each other at a LAFF cocktail party, and Neil asked me if I wanted to do the interview with him and Wayne White, the subject of his documentary, at Wayne’s studio. I said yes, like any professional would, left the party, and nerded out like anyone who is even slightly familiar with Wayne’s work would. This charismatic weirdo is responsible for those bizarre puppets you saw on Pee-wee’s Big Playhouse when you were little, but that’s just a tiny moment in his gifted and colorful career. Berkeley has gracefully captured Wayne’s imaginative voice and vision in BEAUTY - it’s one of the most terrific documentaries I’ve seen in years. 

I met with Neil on Sunday morning and we went into Wayne’s house where he was having breakfast with his family for Father’s Day. (I must take this time to thank his wonderful wife Mimi - who’s also an accomplished artist - for the delicious food). Shortly after, we went down to Wayne’s studio which was filled with wordy works of art and that giant crazy, cool LBJ head - and began the interview. Enjoy. 

Chase: I’m going to start off with you, Neil. I want to start from the top. This is your first film. Why did you decide to make your first film a documentary and when and where did the idea of beauty start to develop?

Neil: Well I, like most people, came out to Hollywood to get into movies. I was writing scripts and TV show ideas but really I was just a PA and intern and just digging ditches. So two things that sort of collided: I knew I wanted to make a movie, right? But also when I met Wayne I knew I wanted to make a movie about Wayne. So it was sort of two dreams colliding. It really started to come to fruition about mid-2009. I had a new company I started called BRKLY that did main titles for TV shows and films. Wayne and I started to have lunch together and we were eating pizza one day and I said, “Hey, you know, you got the book that just came out, your career is kind of taking off, you’re in Esquire magazine, lets take advantage of that, lets make a documentary about you.” And he kind of put me off, like, no no that’s not a good idea, no one want to see that, that’s going to be boring. But finally I said well you’re going to Houston, and I called him up and he was in Houston, and I said, “Hey man, I just bought a camera and some microphones. I’m going to buy a ticket and come down and shoot the Rice installation.” And he said, “Alright, come on down.” So that’s where it really kicked off, but honestly, I’d been wanting to do it of years and years and I was very scared someone would beat me to it, because I couldn’t believe that he had this rich history of impact on pop culture and I knew who he was and how funny and magnetic he could be, so I thought ‘man someone’s going to jump in there and do this.’ So I kept it kind of quiet and I told a few people. The people who knew him were like “yeah great idea, go do it.” But the people who didn’t know him were saying “Well no one knows who he is, who knows…” Like, I told some pretty heavy hitters in Hollywood that I was doing it and they all said, “Don’t do it, it’s not a good idea.” And I showed them.

Chase: You showed them, you stuck it to The Man. 

Neil: For sure and some of them work off…. (fades off, laughing) 

Chase: Don’t get yourself in trouble! So Wayne’s career spans over 20 plus years. How do you tell that in 90 minutes? 

Neil: It’s hard. Well, that’s the reason I knew the movie would be good because there’s two stories. There’s Wayne’s resume which is amazing. You know, just from a professional standpoint, he’s prolific and he’s done so much stuff. And you can’t get it all in there. There’s stuff we didn’t get in. There’s a lot of work that he did that didn’t make the cut because there’s just so much. I mean, Peter Gabriel was whittled down to a shot or two and that’s a huge, impactful video. And there were TV shows that didn’t make it in just because of time. So it was really a back and forth of how much of the career do we tell and how much of his life do we tell and actually the life really started to get more and more and is, to me, the best parts of the movie. You know, seeing him with his family or down here in the studio working, his parents, Mike Quinn, so it was really, you just figure out how much of those stories you tell and when it came to the resume it became, okay, what’s the most important, what’s the most visually stunning, what’s the most memorable, who’s going to recognize it? So that was really the challenge there. 

Chase: Very cool. And this is for you Wayne — so the documentary’s being made about your life, which means that you’re going to have to let people in on your personal space. How did you decide on how much you were willing to let Neil in? 

Wayne: Well, my first fears when he wanted to do this was I looked at other documentaries and they often seemed to be about exploitation and exposure. Exposing something that’s painful or raw or not so pleasant. That seems to be the dramatic motor of documentaries, exposure. You know, they rip the mask — they rip the covers off and here’s the dirty maggots underneath. So I was guarded to go in, I really was. I was guarded, I was protective of my parents when we went down to Tennessee because they’re like complete naïves as far as any of this business goes, so I didn’t want them to be put in a corner, you know? I didn’t want to be put in a corner. So yeah, I definitely had my guard up and I’ve been around Hollywood and filmmaking long enough to know that it’s a tricky dangerous business when you go on camera, you got to watch yourself. I’ve made tons of mistakes on camera over the years being interviewed for TV shows and stuff. So, I was definitely self conscious and prepared to present myself. But as it went along, I just kind of forgot that because Neil was here every day and he was such a ubiquitous — is that the right word? Ubiquitous? I don’t know — He was such a constant presence that I started to take it for granted and let my guard down and just became myself. Plus the new technologies are so unobtrusive, the little camera, there’s no crew, there’s no lights, it’s like you’re just talking to someone like right now, so I did just kind of after awhile let my guard down and just became myself. So in that sense, it does capture something real. 

Neil: You know one comment we’ve gotten a lot is there’s an intimacy to it, and you can kind of see the growth or the track he’s talking about because in the beginning when he brings up that painting and says “this is one of the first things I did, this one’s called Eastern Fuck It.” He puts it up there, he doesn’t look at me, he’s not that animated, he’s just kind of going through the motions, but later on in the movie, something we shot towards the end of shooting was that “just leave the awards on the kitchen table” and he reads it and looks at me and says “that’s funny” and he’s like reacting, responding, you know, getting my, not approval but just running it by me. And you can really see what a year and a half does to just being in a room alone with somebody. And it was. In the movie when we’re in here, it’s just me and if we’re out in the world, it’s just me and Chris Bradley and Wayne. Never more than two people. No lights, no crew — 

Wayne: Yeah, especially when we were out in the world it really, the cameras really disappeared. They were just a couple more faces in the crowd with these small objects and I never even thought of the camera after awhile. I think that’s true of most documentary subjects, I think, you get used to it and start to just relax. But you’re naturally going to be guarded at first. 

Chase: Oh absolutely, and I think that saying what about you, you know, there’s a big trust factor of you being the filmmaker and you being the subject and you letting your guard down so I think that’s great. One thing in the film that I wanted to talk to you about is you kind of talk about how you got burned out by the Hollywood mumbo jumbo so what made you want to somewhat return with this film?

Wayne: Well at first I didn’t want to return with this film, at all. I didn’t want to do it because I am very suspicious of cameras and dramatic interpretations and the whole Hollywood myth-making process. I don’t trust it. I’ve seen it affect people in bad ways. But like I said, besides Neil’s obvious talents as a filmmaker, one of his greatest talents is persistence. Which is number one, I think, for any artist. If you’re not persistent, forget it, you’re not going to make it, you’re not going to do anything. Sheer obstinacy is very very important for anybody who wants to create and Neil has that in spades. So he was just obstinate. He never stopped. When I see that, I respect that and I thought well, alright, he’s like me in that sense, he’s persistent, he wants to do it and I’ll get in on that. One thing I always said though, when we first started doing it, I just thought, well okay let’s just pretend we’re doing it, I’ll humor him. Okay, you pretend you’re a documentary filmmaker and I’ll pretend I’m the great subject. Alright, let’s just pretend we’re having an interview. You know what I mean? That’s how it really felt at first, I was just kind of humoring him. And, you know what, that’s kind of how feel towards myself a lot. Okay, so you’re a sculptor, alright play like you’re a sculptor. Fake it till you make it is one of those cliches that is absolutely true and most people don’t want to do that because they think it’s silly but you’re constantly fooling yourself and tricking yourself into doing things in this life.

Neil: Especially in Hollywood

Wayne: You really got to like kind of pretend to, you know.. It’s wish fulfillment. Most people don’t believe in that. They think it’s silly, but it’s true. 

Chase: Yeah I couldn’t agree more. Neil, going to when you were talking about Wayne looking up at you — and that’s funny right? That’s a really organic moment. And there are a lot of organic moments in the film. What steps did you take in hopes to get those organic moments versus manufactured? 

Neil: Well I mean really, you just — Chris Bradley, the producer/editor on the movie, early on he made a lot of movies and when he came in he was sort of my saving grace because he gave it like shape and focus because he knew what he was doing and I was just trying to figure it out. And he said to me, “You know, people come up to you and say ‘man you’re so lucky you got that shot, you’re so lucky that happened.’” And he said, “Just remind yourself all the time there’s no luck in this. Because things are going to happen whether you are there or not, you still need someone to push the button on the camera and get it and know it’s going to work of the story.” That’s very true, because he’s right. Like Sandra’s daughter, we knew she’d be there, we didn’t know what she’d do or what she looked like or how she would react so we just said “Mrs. Stoddard, Wayne’s inside, here’s a book,” and let her go in. And Chris was there with the camera, and, you know, he got the shot. That moment in here, that was just a day of me and Wayne shooting. I was going to shoot him painting. And that ended up being one of my favorite scenes in the movie because it really shows — 

Wayne: And the banjo playing that song. 

Neil: Oh, another one. The Blue Ridge Mountain Song. I needed — I was putting together teasers to show investors and I needed some banjo so I said, “Hey I’m going to come over, I’m not even going to light it, I’m not going to shoot anything, but I want camera audio, just play.” And Wayne started to hum. And this was over a year into shooting and he had never sung or hum or anything and I said, “Are you humming?” And he said “Yeah, I’m just humming a tune.” And I said, “Is it a song? Do you know the words to a song?” And he said “Yeah I know the words, it’s called Blue Ridge Mountain Blues.” And I said, “Wait, hold on, can you sing and play at the same time? What is going on?” So he sang the song and played it. I knew about his parents and his dad and I heard the lyrics and I was like, oh wait, this is a moment, this is real. So I said, “Okay sit there, let’s shoot it.” It’s just being aware. Like that’s how — that’s what’s organic about it. It’s being aware and seeing it and knowing your story and what you need to get and then making sure you get it right. We shot that song several times because I knew I had to get it right. So that’s why, it’s just being aware and being open. 

Wayne: I think a lot of the best moments are like that. That were just found and organic and a lot of the most carefully planned constructions were ditched, like the green screen stuff and all these well laid plans were not as good as the organic moments, I think. 

Neil: And Mike Quinn. You can’t plan Mike Quinn. You can’t assume that — we had no idea. We knew he was something else. Wayne was always saying, “You gotta get Mike.” We had no idea what he was really like. So you go there and you meet him and then here you go. 

Chase: That’s always the scariest thing about doing interviews. I don’t know them personally so questions are always like, is this overboard, is this maybe too goofy for them, how will they take me serious? 

Neil: People love real human chemistries and if you can put it on the screen you are going to get people’s hearts; you’re going to go straight to them. That’s one of the secrets of life. I think we got a lot of that on camera. 

Chase: Oh absolutely, I couldn’t agree more. So going back to earlier, what you said that when you’re talking to people about making this film and some people didn’t know who he was and they were urging you not to make it, and the film is made and some of the audience may not know who Wayne is, how did you balance his career and personal life while making it all engaging at the same time? 

Neil: Well, I think just the way he naturally tells the story. That’s the one thing did, we let him be the narrator for his own movie. So that worked out really well because you never really feel like you’re leaving his story. Even when you’re in Pee-Wee’s it feels like it’s Wayne’s story, and when you’re in the South you’re learning about Wayne but you’re getting his career. You hear about Mrs. Cabobble’s but he tells us the story. When he’s up on stage delivering his monologue, he’s narrating. He’s the narrator. I think that ended up being a great device to move us through the story, keep it about Wayne, and let him sort of tell his own story. 

Wayne: That’s the root of the problem I had with it in the beginning too. I’m neurotic in the sense that I can have a crowd of 300 people cheering you, applauding you, standing O, but one guy come out of the audience and go, “Hey man, you should have cut 20 minutes. That wasn’t so good.” And I’ll just obsess on that one guy. After all this love, I’ll obsess on him and want to smash his face in and strangle him and kick him down the stairs and I’ll be pouting about that one guy all night. I can’t help it. I always focus in on the negative. No matter how much I’m on and people are loving me, there’s always some like, and it’s usually a woman too, in the audience rolling her eyes, “Oh Wayne, you’re embarrassing yourself.” There’s always someone like that. So when Neil asked me to do that, I always see that one prototypical smart-ass New York woman rolling her eyes in the audience, “Oh Wayne, please stop, you’re just embarrassing yourself.” So I’m always going to get that reaction because when I perform I’m very extroverted and I wear my heart on my sleeve and some people don’t like that. They’re embarrassed for me. So I kind of was focused on that a little too much and I don’t know why I do that, it’s just that one little smudge always bugs me. I’m a perfectionist I guess. Everyone has to love me, I guess, I don’t know. 

Chase: So going into that, does make it harder or easier to be in front of a camera talking about your life?

Wayne: Well no, once the cameras rolling or the audience is in the seats, I’m on. I can’t help it. I go into a trance. I have some sort of performing gene that’s just there and I cannot explain it but I want to connect with people through a camera or on a stage. I just can do it. I just have an intuitive sense of it. So I love doing that, I love going into that trance. 

Neil: That’s another reason I knew it would work. Those interviews we shot, most of the interviews of Wayne we shot in here over the course of like three or four days. When you see the “too long at the fair” when he’s against the books. I would come over here in the mornings at like nine and we would have coffee and then come down here and shoot for a few hours and then come back the next day and do it again. But not having gone through it really, I just said, “Look, tell me your story, start at zero and we’ll just go to today.” It was like flipping a switch. Loquacious is the best word. You just turned it on and he just went and went and went and I was like, oh this is going to be easy, this guy will talk all day. 

Wayne: I want to communicate. I do; every artist does. That’s why you’re an artist. It’s about communication, no matter how impossibly hard your art is to understand and how much of an ivory tower or high horse you get on, it’s still basically communication or why are you doing it? I hate the whole group of artists who are so hermetic and completely indecipherable on some level and they’re all proud of themselves for it. It’s like, how obnoxious, how pretentious. And that’s part of my mission as an artist is to kick down those people or make fun of that type of high horse attitude. 

Chase: Going a little deeper into when you said you want things to be perfect and a little neurotic, so — 

Wayne: And another thing is guys who had these things done and then they come back going “Oh I didn’t want to do this, this is horrible, this is so horrible.” Like Crumb, when his movie came out, what an asshole. I mean come on, man, that is so disingenuous. That’s such a bullshit attitude. You let him do it, you went through the whole process and now you’re going to act like you’re too cool? I hate people who act too cool for school. Just own up to it, dude. 

Chase: That pretty much answers the question because I was going to ask how you kept your distance from Neil whenever he’s doing his filming, post production, all that.

Wayne: All I do is work, that’s all my life is work. And that’s all I’m really concerned with is doing my thing. I just came back from a month and a half of work in Virginia, where I did my biggest art installation yet, my biggest piece of art yet. I worked 12 hours a day, 7 days a week, for a month and a half. I’m just a mule with blinders on, I can’t help myself. So after the filming was over, I didn’t even think about it, it was back to work.

Neil: He also let me do my — like, he didn’t see it until South by Southwest with the crowd at the world premier. He let me do my thing.

Wayne: That’s another thing I keep saying over and over about it. I practice the artist’s golden rule. I wouldn’t want somebody telling me how to finish my painting, I’m not going to tell him how to finish his movie or how to shape his movie. When I commit to working with an artist, I give them as much respect as I would like and if I’m not going to commit that way, then I don’t want to work with you. If I see that I can’t respect you or I see that you’re fucked up somehow, I won’t work with you. But I committed, I believed he could do it, and I believed it until the very end. That’s the risk you take. Making art is nothing but risk, always. If it’s not risk, it’s no good. 

Chase: Absolutely. So one of the most recognized moments in your career is Pee-Wee’s Playhouse. When you started working with Pee-Wee, at the time, did you know he was going to end up blowing up to be such a big pop culture icon?

Wayne: Well he already was a pop culture icon. By the time I came along, he’d already made Pee-Wee’s Big Adventure in ‘86 and that’s how he got the TV show. So he was on a huge roll by the time I came along, not quite peaking yet but there. I mean, he was coming on strong. So, yeah, it was already very exciting when I jumped in and that’s what spurred us on too, just the pure excitement of working with a superstar. So that was a thrilling, thrilling time for me. That was what took me off the mean streets of New York and gave me a career. 

Chase: So Neil, going back to this being your first film, you’re making a documentary on a career about a guy whose career is still going. So when you were shooting how did you know when it was complete and ready? 

Neil: That’s a good question. These things could go on and on and on and on. I guess, I knew, well, we knew we had the story told, we knew we had his career told, we knew we were up to today. We started screening it for a lot of people and showed it to a lot of people and it took many forms. You give yourself a deadline. I knew it was ready when I thought it was good and people thought it was good and we knew we were there. It’s not like, there’s no ending, nothing’s going to happen in his real life that was going to end the thing. 

Wayne: We did create our own little dramatic arc with that talk though. The talk began as just crude slide talk and then I shaped it with Neil’s direction into an hour long piece of theater, a monologue, and then it played here in LA and then it sort of peaked out in New York City at Roseland Ballroom with the big audience and the standing ovation and they kind of used that as an emotional, dramatic peak in the movie when I’m dancing in slow motion on the stage at the end. So that arc of that talk kind of determined, I think, the end of the movie. 

Neil: Yes, that is very true. The talk is a very important part of the movie and actually when you see it, when you first see it, it’s at Largo, but the first bits of it are at the art center and it’s very small and intimate and it does, it does go big and ends up at Roseland Ballroom with 1500 people in the crowd. So it sort of is like watching his career from the small space to where he is now, which is, you know, on top of the world. 

Wayne: I think that definitely for me gave it a dramatic arc and after that Roseland thing it felt like, all right, now it’s time to start cutting it all together. That was like, travel to the big city, the promise land, hit a home run, and now lets put it together. 

Neil: We didn’t shoot a whole lot after that. 

Chase: So to kind of finish this up, the film’s done and you’ve played at some festivals. So kind of talk about the Kickstarter campaign for its theatrical release and how that’s going.

Neil: We had our world premiere at South by Southwest and since then we’ve been to nine more festivals. We’ve been to Atlanta and Boston and Hot Docs and Full Frame and Nashville, Oklahoma City, and now we’re in the LA Film Festival and we’re going to be in Silverdocs next week and we’re going to be at Just For Laughs in Montreal in July. We’ve won three Best Documentary awards, we’ve won an audience award for the fan favorite in Nashville, and it’s been amazing. And our distribution plans are going very well. We got TV lined up, we’ve got DVD and Blu-ray and digital lined up. And we really want to do theatrical because I want people to see it in a crowd, in a dark theater, because there are so many emotions that are just better when you react to people reacting to it. Like laughter. People love to laugh together. Like when I’m at home and I’m watching shows, I don’t laugh out loud, but if I’m in a crowd and everyone is into it… And also inspiration. I think there’s an energy that goes, it’s a very inspiring movie and there’s an energy in a crowd that just gets amplified. So we’re going to do theaters but we’re self-distributing. We’ve got rockstars: PR, booking, producers ready to take it out there into the world. And we’re trying to raise the funds to market the movie and make sure that happens. So we started a Kickstarter campaign. You can go onto Kickstarter: “Beauty is Embarrassing,” search that. But the great thing is, the really cool thing is, yeah you’re helping us with our movie but you get rewards and you don’t get all the money unless all the money comes in. Like if you want $10 and you get nine, you don’t get it. But we got t-shirts and DVDs, signed books,  we got silkscreens that he designed, we got a print of an actual Word Painting that says “Beauty is Embarrassing” — 

Wayne: Even an LBJ head 

Neil: An LBJ head, a replica LBJ head, signed posters, private screenings, we’re putting a letter-pressed poster on there today, a beautiful letter-press. So it’s really, everywhere we go, every festival, “How can we own Wayne’s art? How can we own Wayne’s art?” And this is the best way to do it right now. And original sketches, like he’s going to do sketches for people. So now’s the chance to own some Wayne White art. Because these things, most of us can’t afford.

Chase: That’s fantastic. Alright man, well thanks so much for both of your time. I mean, I’m super stoked, going back to the theatrical thing, I’m with you. I don’t like watching screeners, unless I have to. I watched this on a screener and now I’m glad I can make this film on Thursday. I try not to watch screeners because movies should be seen in a theater, it’s the whole theatrical experience. So it’s great and I’m going to do all I can —

Neil: Thank you

Chase: All my 10 friends. I’ll try to get them to come.

Neil: Well, Twitch Film has a following so that will help.

Chase: Twitch Film has a pretty big following so yeah, that will definitely get my word out about everything.

Interviewed and Posted on Twitch Film

LAFF 2012 INTERVIEW: PINCUS WRITER/DIRECTOR DAVID FENSTER

I have a lot of respect for David Fenster. He made an excellent movie called PINCUS, about a slacker with heart who takes cares of his father with Parkinson’s Disease. He got really up-close-and-personal for the film and cast his real father who has had Parkinson’s for the last 13 years. It’s a labor of love, really. 

I fell in love with PINCUS - It hit really close to home to me so I reached out to Fenster’s wonderful PR team and begged for an interview with him and here we are. I hope you enjoy reading it as much as I did writing. 
I have to start off by saying this movie hit really close to home. My father has been disabled since I was a young boy - he’s blind in one eye and cannot see peripheral vision in his other - and has needed assistance almost his entire life. Seeing this film really brought a feeling of hope for my dad when he gets to the point where he needs care full-time. Since we couldn’t do this interview in person (due to timing issues), I definitely plan to give you a giant hug if we ever meet in person. I know Philip Lord so I’ll just bug him until he makes it happen. 


I want to first talk about this being somewhat fact, somewhat fiction. From my understanding, your father really has Parkinson’s. How did you discuss with him the idea of making a film built around him, and what was his initial response when it was decided he would star in the film as well?

I began doing video and audio interviews with my dad a couple years ago. I just asked him if I could record our conversations and he didn’t mind. I wasn’t sure what I would do with the recordings but they seemed to facilitate deeper conversations about life’s big questions. Territory I don’t think we would have gotten to as easily in regular conversation. The recording made the talks seem more urgent and important. When I had the idea to put my dad in the fictional film that became PINCUS he was already comfortable with the recording and said he was fine with trying some acting. He just didn’t understand why anyone would want to watch him on screen. I still have to convince him that he’s one of (if not the most) compelling part of the film.

Has he seen the film yet? If so, what was it like watching this with him?

He has. We set up a private screening in this great theater in Miami called the Tower Theater. My dad was able to attend and the room was filled with friends and family, it was very emotional. He doesn’t have a lot of great days anymore and he really enjoyed seeing the film and having so many loved ones around. It was a special event for all of us.

There are three relationship stories in PINCUS: you as your father’s caretaker, your friendship with Dietmar, the never-sober German hobo who sleeps in the homes you two are supposed to be building, and Anna, the yoga instructor you’re infatuated with. All three of these could really stand out on their own. How did you evenly balance these stories when writing and shooting?

I think the balancing of the stories was always important. I wasn’t interested in creating a high stakes central storyline for this film, so I thought several smaller, intertwining stories would be compelling and keep things at a scale that reflected everyday life. I actually spent a lot of time writing and structuring the film, although people who have seen the film might laugh when they hear that. When I began editing, I realized I could switch the order of the scenes quite drastically and the story still made sense. But the reordering obviously changes the meaning of the scenes and the balance of all the stories. So a lot of the balancing came about in editing.

Since this story is very personal to you, at what point did you know the script was finished and ready to move into shooting? 

It never felt finished and I was very nervous about the script, even during shooting. There were plenty of times I wished I had had more time to work on the script and I often cursed myself for not listening to certain bits of writing advice. But we had to shoot. My dad gets progressively less mobile on a monthly basis and David Nordstrom was releasing his movie, SAWDUST CITY, so we were on a tight schedule.

In the film your character is a deadbeat with a lot good in him. He spends most of his time drinking, smoking, and ignoring client phone calls, but will drop everything to help his father. How much of Pincus is really you?

Pincus is definitely not meant to be 100 percent me. Of course there are some strong autobiographical elements to the character but he is also an amalgam of my mom (who is my dad’s primary caretaker), David Nordstrom, my friend Gavin (who is married to a yoga teacher and runs a construction company), other friends and pure fantasy.

Follow up to the above: Why did you decide on writing Pincus as a loser with nothing really going for him except his love for his dad? Do you see Pincus as trying to better himself?

I think Pincus is forced into a situation he doesn’t want to be in and his irresponsibility is a form of rebellion. Pincus is also busy thinking about lofty things so he lets a lot of earthly tasks slip through the cracks. He wants to believe there are mystical forces all around him but he’s cynical and this frustrates him. Maybe he realizes helping his father, as irritating and depressing as it can be, is the most meaningful, tangible thing in his life. His interior life, or my conception of his interior life, is pretty autobiographical.

One of the many things I find interesting about PINCUS is that it’s written as a narrative feature but is shot like a documentary. Why did you decide to shoot it this way vs. the traditional style? 

I wanted to create situations, let them play out and shoot it like I would a documentary. This film is as much a portrait of the people I care about and find interesting as anything, so I wanted those people to be able to say what they really think and are interested in. I thought that format would allow people to bring a lot of themselves to the film. I also had documentary footage of my dad that needed to fit into whatever fictional stuff I shot. So there was the idea of using a matching style to seamlessly integrate the documentary footage.

You’re a multi-hyphenate. You wrote, directed, edited, shot, and produced PINCUS. Which area do you enjoy most?

I enjoy the writing most these days. I like the openness and possibility of this stage. Trying to physically realize the film is always the most intimidating part for me, but I love the camaraderie of shooting and the unexpected things that happen. I can say I enjoy editing the least. It takes so long and I don’t like the isolation and the time in front of a computer. But I can’t imagine having someone else edit my films, so much of them is created in the editing.

The one thing you did not do was star in the film, even though elements are taken from your life. What made you decide to stay behind the camera? Did you ever consider taking the lead? 

I’m terribly self-conscious in front of cameras. So it never occurred to me. But I am interested in acting and learn a lot every time I try it. So maybe someday.

You frequently work with actor David Nordstrom, who plays the titular role in PINCUS. What is it about him that made you feel confident he’d accurately portray the person who the audience might assume is you? 

 People think we’re brothers or the same person. We don’t understand this as he is much taller and we don’t really look alike. In any case, because of this perceived resemblance, I knew people would believe him to be my father’s son. I also knew my family would be comfortable having him around and this would read on screen.

Final and most important question - will you give your father a big hug for me? He’s great.

Yes. I’ll be in Miami in a week or two and I’ll give him a hug for you!

Thanks for your interest in, and enthusiasm about, the film, Chase. It means a lot.

PINCUS is screening again on Thursday, June 21st at 7:40pm at Regal Cinemas L.A. LIVE 13. 


Photo Credit: Bob Anderson | Interviewed and Posted on Twitch Film 


Sex and Love Get Complicated in 'Your Sister's Sister'


Your Sister's Sister
Benjamin Kasulke

We’ve seen a lot of indie movies at the cineplex lately with the similar themes: relationships put in uncomfortable situations we hope never to face. Awkward breakups, unwanted pregnancies, villainous ex-lovers and anything that could ruin a potentially wonderful relationship are all on the table.

Similarly, Lynn Shelton’s latest effort, “Your Sister’s Sister,” starring Mark Duplass, Emily Blunt, and Rosemary DeWitt, is a moving, serendipitous love story about people aching for love which, through stubborn compromises and foolish decisions, they just might find. The film is an admirable examination of making what could be considered a bad decision, and the string of undesired events that come from it. Cause and effect.

Jack (Mark Duplass) has a few problems. He hates his dead brother, he’s mad at the world, and he needs a break. At the suggestion of his best friend Iris (Emily Blunt), on the one-year anniversary of his brother’s death, Jack rides his bike, hops on a ferry and heads to the middle of nowhere to stay in her family’s cabin to get his head straight.

Also Check Out: Interview: Emily Blunt, Rosemarie DeWitt and Lynn Shelton on “Your Sister’s Sister”

When he arrives, he finds that Iris’ sister Hannah (DeWitt) is also staying there to get her head straight, unbeknownst to Iris. After a few dozen shots of tequila and some intimate conversation, Hannah and Jack have what they thought would be a one-night stand, which turns into a weekend crash course on romance. Iris shows up unexpectedly to check in on Jack, who doesn’t want his best friend to know that he just slept with his sister. What he does know, however, is that Iris has plans to tell him that she loves him.

Mark Duplass has already achieved so much in the film industry. He’s one of the pioneers of the “Mumblecore Generation” (although you shouldn’t ever ask him about it), and has broken into making bigger films with bigger stars, such as the recent “Jeff, Who Lives at Home." Sometimes he pops his head in front of the camera, having starred in movies cowritten and directed by his brother Jay. It’s safe to say he wears many hats successfully, and “Your Sister’s Sister” really relies on Duplass’ Jack. Do we want to feel sorry for this loser? Do we even care? Why is he mad at his dead brother? By the end of the film we really don’t feel anything for the guy — he wants us to know he will always be a loser — but we do want him to gain some form of happiness out of the weird, weird situation he has just put himself in.

Blunt and DeWitt carry on natural conversations like sisters, as if they’ve known each other since birth. One irritating thing about this, however — which does eventually get addressed — is Iris’ English accent. Addressing it earlier in the film would have eased the curiosity factor quite a bit.

The relationships in “Your Sister’s Sister are complicated. Jack just slept with Hannah, whose sister is Iris, Jack’s best friend, who wants to tell Jack that she loves him. The more Jack and Hannah prolong telling Iris about their drunken sexual encounter, the harder it’s going to hurt. One of the things you may ask yourself is, “I go to the movies to escape for 90+ minutes from the slums of everyday life. Why would I want to see a movie that depicts a situation that feels so real?” The answer is simple: It’s comforting to watching dramatic and comic fiction regarding the things some of us actually have to deal with in life. When done right, those kinds of films are worth your time. “Your Sister’s Sister” happens to be one of them.

Written and posted on MTV’s NextMovie.com

L.A. FILM FEST 2012 EXCLUSIVE: FIRST CHARACTER POSTERS FOR ALEX KARPOVSKY'S RED FLAG

I have to hand it to Alex Karpovsky. Every time I attend a film festival, he’s either acting in a movie playing there, or has directed one. This guy is always working. His hard work has really paid off on the boob tube recently, and you can watch this festival darling every week on the Lena Dunham-created, Judd Apatow-produced HBO show, Girls.

Alex is still on the move and will be premiering his fifth directorial feature (he also wrote and stars in the film), Red Flag. Starring as himself, Red Flag follows a self-involved independent filmmaker, Alex, who takes his film (Woodpecker, which Karpovsky actually made in 2008) on a 12-screening tour across the U.S. He hopes this journey of self-discovery will help him get over his recent (i.e. yesterday) ex-girlfriend. A coming-of-age story for a guy too old to be coming-of-age.Red Flag co-stars Onur Tukel (Septien), Jennifer Prediger (Uncle Kent), and Caroline White (Open Five). I haven’t seen the film at the time this was written, but Karpovsky produces quality work, whether in front of the camera or behind, so I’m sure I’ll be tossing it in the “great work, dude!” pile.

Alex and his team has sent us the first character posters for Red Flag, and you can check them out after the break. Red Flag is an Official Selection (Narrative Competition) of the 2012 Los Angeles Film Festival, and is having its World Premiere today at 9:50 p.m. at Regal Cinemas L.A. LIVE.

RedFlag-AlexKarpovsky-thumb-650x1004-31545.jpg

RedFlag-CarolineWhite-thumb-650x1004-31548.jpg

RedFlag-JenniferPrediger-thumb-650x1004-31551.jpg

RedFlag-OnurTukel.jpg

Source: Twitch Film

Review: LOLA VERSUS Puts the Fun in Dysfunctional Love


Lola Versus
Fox Searchlight

Remember when you were 10, and you thought by 22 you’d be married, with a big house (that has a white picket fence) and two perfect children? Maybe a dog and a cat to complete the family? But when you hit 30, you may start to realize that all those dreams won’t necessarily come true. Welcome to the suck, sucker.

"Lola Versus" is the story of a girl who didn’t get everything she wanted, at the time she wanted it — and how she deals with that. Greta Gerwig is Lola, who’s fixing to marry the man of her dreams, Luke (played by future RoboCop and current Detective Stephen Holder on AMC’s “The Killing,” Joel Kinnaman). Things are going well for Lola. She’s about to finish school, the wedding planning is coming along nicely … and then kerplunk, Luke calls off the engagement just three weeks before the wedding.

Also Check Out: 5 Questions With “Lola Versus” Star and Writer Zoe Lister-Jones

Like anyone who’s just had their childhood dreams shattered, Lola reluctantly embarks on a journey of self-discovery through a series of unfortunate events. It’s Lola versus the world.

Lola Versus
Fox Searchlight

Instead of filling the movie with romantic cliches that almost never work in the real world (Carrie Bradshaw would never take Mr. Big back after what he put her through, amirite?), we get an honest and hilariously awkward story about being an adult while at the same time learning to be an adult. It’s coming-of-age story about a woman who’s too old to be coming of age. And in a strange and charming way, it all works.

"Lola Versus" stars the new queen of independent cinema, Greta Gerwig. The ’90s had Parker Posey; we have Gerwig, who’s appeared in "LOL," "Nights and Weekends" and "Greenberg" (for which she earned an Indie Spirit Award nomination). In her films, we get to watch her characters go through all the relationship woes and life oopsies that all of us can relate to in one way or another and think, "Thank God I am not alone."

Lola has a lot of love to give, but she just doesn’t know where to put it. Gerwig knows how to play this damsel in distress, making awkward look endearing. But when it’s time for Lola to pull out those identifiable moments of loneliness, Gerwig bangs you over the head like a bag of hammers. (As a bonus, Bill Pullman plays Lola’s free-living father and, as always, rules.)

Also Check Out: Interview with “Lola Versus” Star Greta Gerwig

"Lola Versus" marks the second writing collaboration between real-life couple Zoe Lister-Jones (who almost steals the movie as Lola’s potty-mouthed best friend, Alice) and Daryl Wein (who directed the film). There’s no doubt this film is a thank you card to the hell that these two once put each other through. Hopeless romantics will recognize many of the things we’ve experienced during an unwanted breakup: the power-eating, the sex with strangers and friends, and yes, the not showering or underwear-changing for days.

These are real people in real situations using real dialogue. “Lola Versus” is what happens when you shake life up a little bit and let it fall out of your hands.

From the GATW Archives: SXSW 2011 EXCLUSIVE: MY SUCKY TEEN ROMANCE clip

When I think about how much 18 year old filmmaker Emily Hagins has already accomplished in her short life, I reflect back to my sucky teen years and how I didn’t really achieve anything until adulthood. Hagins has made three feature films already and the third, MY SUCKY TEEN ROMANCE, will be making its world premiere at the prestigious Paramount Theatre on Tuesday, March 15th at 9:30PM during the SXSW Film Festival.

To tame that bloodthirsty appetite to finally see MSTR, we’ve been supplied with an exclusive clip from the film. In this clip, one of our main characters, Paul (Patrick Delgado), gets held up at gunpoint when a vampire (Devin Bonnée) who looks eerily like Robert Pattinson is hungry for money. Hit the break to see the clip and official synopsis!

From the GATW Archives: Sundance 2011 Review: WIN WIN

Editor’s note: This review was originally written on February 3rd, 2011 at the Sundance Film Festival

Rating: 4.5/5

Writers: Thomas McCarthy (screenplay and story), Joe Tiboni (story)
Director: Thomas McCarthy
CastPaul GiamattiAmy RyanJeffrey TamborAmy RyanMelanie LynskeyBobby Cannavale

Tom McCarthy can do no wrong. He first captured our hearts with his writing/directing debut, THE STATION AGENT. Then he showed the world Richard Jenkins has the full potential to be a leading man in THE VISITOR (for which Jenkins garnered a well-deserved Oscar nod). And now, in 2011, McCarthy is back with his third feature, a high school wrestling movie with a lot of heart, WIN WIN.

WIN WIN is a story of unlikely people entering each other’s lives. Mike Flaherty (Paul Giamatti) is a lawyer by day, high school wresting coach by night. His practice isn’t very successful (he can’t even afford to fix the plumbing), and he’s not at all in shape (being outran in the opening scene gives us this heads up). He decides to take one of his clients into his care after discovering he can get paid weekly for it, and meets his runaway grandson, child wrestling prodigy Kyle Timmons (newcomer Alex Shaffer). Kyle soon starts wrestling on Flaherty’s team and everything around him begins to look promising again, from the wrestling team to family life. Little known fact: WIN WIN was spawned off McCarthy’s real life friendship with a former high school wrestling teammate.

Tom McCarthy knows the dynamics of friendship and family. WIN WIN is a charming story about making the right choices. As Flaherty is teaching Kyle to do the right thing, we learn he’s wrestling troubles of his own. McCarthy gives balances to real life problems with real life solutions. Sometimes good people make bad decisions and almost always they learn and grow from it.

It’s no shock that Giamatti turns out another fine performance in WIN WIN. Again and again, he puts his all in to everything he does, showing the world how powerful one can be with a set of lines. This man can silence a room with his signature droopy facial expressions. He’s an actor’s actor. The Babe Ruth of thespians.

WIN WIN’s character interactions are what, excuse me, win us over. As Jackie Flaherty (the forever wonderful Amy Ryan) is talking to Kyle about new starts in life, she references her Jon Bon Jovi initialed ankle tattoo - a.k.a. a physical reminder of her rebellious stage. This is one of many small, dynamite interactions in WIN WIN that speak so loudly about how effective real communication can be.  When you’re young and feel like the world is against you, it’s nice to know a peer once sat in your spot in life.

Giamatti is aided by Jeffrey Tambor and Bobby Cannavale. These two very funny actors play Flaherty’s assistant coaches and come so close to completely pulling the mat from under Giamatti’s feet. This is the best (and one of the most unexpected) comedic duos I’ve seen on screen in a very long time. It’s almost as if McCarthy let these two run amok, only telling them to read their lines and spin it how ever the hell they want. If that’s the case, it worked.

WIN WIN makes Tom McCarthy three-for-three. Grabbing the affection from the audience is what he wants, and my dear reader, he can’t lose.